1077777 - Please deploy release 0.12.3 to loop-server Production

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Cloud Services :: Operations: Deployment Requests - DEPRECATED, task)

Comment 1

[Dean Wilson (:deanw)]

I've deployed this to production and it can be seen at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1077777. rpapa can you have a basic look and if it appears fine I'll swap production DNS over to point at this.

Comment 2

[Dean Wilson (:deanw)]

Actually it's at https://loop-server-20-elb-5ov030lbwrb6-654042815.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com/ - copy and paste fail.

Comment 3

[Richard Pappalardo [:rpapa][:rpappalardo]]

Thanks, Dean! (glad you're feeling better)

Initial quick check on:
https://loop-server-20-elb-5ov030lbwrb6-654042815.us-west-2.elb.amazonaws.com/

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:49:37 GMT
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 321
Connection: keep-alive
ETag: W/"141-338cb29e"
Timestamp: 1412786977


That's about all I can check until you cut it over.  Once you've changed DNS, needinfo me and I'll do final verification on https://loop.services.mozilla.com/.

Comment 4

[Dean Wilson (:deanw)]

I've now repointed the DNS to this stack in production so it's live.

Comment 5

[Richard Pappalardo [:rpapa][:rpappalardo]]

QUICK CHECKS

4-5 calls between Nightly and Aurora without incident.

A quick 'make test' against 0.12.3 has some errors:
http://pastebin.mozilla.org/6750087

Alexis - do we need to be concerned with these?


If not, I'll go ahead and verify.

https://loop.services.mozilla.com/
{"name":"mozilla-loop-server","description":"The Mozilla Loop (WebRTC App) server","version":"0.12.3","homepage":"https://github.com/mozilla-services/loop-server/","endpoint":"https://loop.services.mozilla.com","fakeTokBox":false,"fxaOAuth":true,"i18n":{"defaultLang":"en-US","lang":"en-US"}}

$ curl -I https://loop.services.mozilla.com
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:04:21 GMT
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Content-Length: 277
Connection: keep-alive
ETag: W/"115-84537797"
Timestamp: 1412874261

Comment 6

[Alexis Metaireau (:alexis)]

re-running the tests should make them pass, we have them sometimes, due to how they're written, no big deal.

Comment 7

[Richard Pappalardo [:rpapa][:rpappalardo]]

Thanks for letting me know, Alexis.  re-ran them several times yesterday and saw those failures, but they all pass when I ran them today.

No negative feedback from release. Closing this ticket.