Closed
Bug 1079937
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Kill the mozilla-b2g28_v1_3t branch in automation
Categories
(Release Engineering :: General, defect)
Release Engineering
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: RyanVM, Assigned: hwine)
References
Details
Attachments
(4 files)
1.36 KB,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
rail
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
17.56 KB,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
rail
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
836 bytes,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
rail
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
7.41 KB,
patch
|
bhearsum
:
review+
rail
:
checked-in+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We're currently bumping up against the limit of the number of different jobs our Linux test slaves can run. This is hindering efforts like bug 1078507 where we're hitting frequent failures *now* due to not being able to spread the tests over enough chunks. While going through what jobs we can kill to give us some breathing room, b2g28 v1.3t came up as a good candidate. There have been a few comments made to the effect that 1.3t is EOL on our end of things at this point (as a recent example, we declined to take the NSS chemspill on it). Bhavana, can you please "officially" bless this so we can add it to the list of things to do on Monday? :)
Flags: needinfo?(bbajaj)
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
I spoke with Bhavana in person about this today. She's OK with us turning off builds/tests on v1.3t provided we do so in a way that leaves us the ability to turn them back on if circumstances were to dictate it for some reason or another. It should be doable to do that without ripping out all the code, right? And that should still accomplish the goal of reducing the number of builders IIUC.
Flags: needinfo?(bbajaj)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Agree with Ryanvm here, keeping in mind the partner releases ahead related to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1064636, did not want to kill this branch entirely until the next 2-3 weeks to make sure we do not have any urgent landing done that may be needed. Although, I am fine to turn-off builds/tests until really necessary.
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
If we're looking to do this to make room for other builders, and we need to maintain the ability to turn them back on - it sounds like we shouldn't do this. Otherwise we'll quickly replace the builders with other ones, and won't be able to turn these back on if necessary...
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Hey relenger's, I've discussed with TAM's maintaining the 1.3T product and at this point I think we can kill this branch in terms of automation support given there are no new landings. I just want to be sure that the repo's will still exists for partners to pick-up code in case we see more releases from the tip of this branch. Ni Hal/rail to get going on the above.
Flags: needinfo?(rail)
Flags: needinfo?(hwine)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Yay! If no ones picks it this week, I can slash and burn it early next week.
Flags: needinfo?(rail)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
This also means update.boot2gecko.org dies
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to bhavana bajaj [:bajaj] from comment #4) > I just want to be sure that the repo's will still exists > for partners to pick-up code in case we see more releases from the tip of > this branch. We'll leave the associated gecko repository in place (where any new commits would land): http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g28_v1_3t We'll also leave the mirroring in place that puts those changes on the v1.3t branch in: https://git.mozilla.org/releases/gecko.git https://github.com/mozilla/gecko-dev With the build configs gone, I see no need to maintain the gaia mirror. It can be regenerated within several hours. http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/gaia-1_3t/ n/i: rail do you agree with removal of integration repository?
Flags: needinfo?(hwine) → needinfo?(rail)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Okay - after all builds are disabled, assign the bug to me to take care of the repository stuff.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → rail
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8539321 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8539325 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8539327 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8539321 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8539325 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8539327 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8539328 -
Flags: review?(bhearsum) → review+
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Removed from TBPL. I've pinged in #treeherder about getting it done for that as well. https://hg.mozilla.org/webtools/tbpl/rev/a97ed7f7ece3
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8539321 [details] [diff] [review] kill_v1_3t-buildbotcustom.diff https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbotcustom/rev/a748312e9aa5
Attachment #8539321 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 16•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8539325 [details] [diff] [review] kill_v1_3t-buildbot-configs.diff https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/390650d81a26
Attachment #8539325 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 17•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8539327 [details] [diff] [review] kill_v1_3t-tools.diff https://hg.mozilla.org/build/tools/rev/2399669ab652
Attachment #8539327 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 18•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8539328 [details] [diff] [review] kill_v1_3t-mozharness.diff https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/d6b5b9268f62
Attachment #8539328 -
Flags: checked-in+
Comment 19•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-5] from comment #14) > Removed from TBPL. I've pinged in #treeherder about getting it done for that > as well. > https://hg.mozilla.org/webtools/tbpl/rev/a97ed7f7ece3 Thanks!
Comment 20•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM UTC-5] from comment #14) > Removed from TBPL. I've pinged in #treeherder about getting it done for that > as well. File a bug and assign it to me and I'll take care of it :-) (Whilst realtime IRC conversations are valuable for many things, I think lower priority items like this that can be communicated asynchronously should use Bugzilla as the primary means of communication - if only because the treeherder devs are so keen to attempt "to please all the people all the time", that they'll end up diverting away from whatever they are working on to discuss/fix an issue that could have waited a day, incurring the context switch cost for something that could have just been filed as a bug)
Comment 22•10 years ago
|
||
FTR, it's in production
Updated•10 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Component: General Automation → General
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•