1081796 - [tarako][dolphin]Error: Stk Event Notfiy: Required value missing : Alpha ID.

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1031640

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)

Description

[孟宪茂]

Go to STK,it can not show the sub-menu with sim "mcc":"334","mnc":"050".

09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : RIL Worker: Parcel handling threw Error: Stk Event Notfiy: Required value missing : Alpha ID
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : processEventNotify@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:10364
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : STK_CMD_SEND_SMS@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:10550
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : createParam@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:10067
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : processStkProactiveCommand@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:5131
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : UNSOLICITED_STK_EVENT_NOTIFY@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:6577
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : handleParcel@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:5153
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : processParcel@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:161
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : processIncoming@blob:b7e2039d-ffe0-4631-8663-4ec1579b7e23:536
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : handleRilMessage@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:14627
09-18 13:57:25.920    88   237 I Gecko   : onRILMessage@resource://gre/modules/ril_worker.js:14672

Comment 1

[孟宪茂]

Attachment: screenshot

Comment 2

[孟宪茂]

Dear shawn,

The alpha identifier is optional in  R-UIM,please help check the error "RIL Worker: Parcel handling threw Error: Stk Event Notfiy: Required value missing : Alpha ID".

Thanks!

Comment 3

[孟宪茂]

Attachment: main.log

Comment 4

[shawn ku [:sku]]

should dup. to Bug 1031640.

Comment 5

[Vance Chen [:vchen][skype:vance.lucida][[e-mail]]]

Hi Xianmao -

As Shawn mentioned in Comment#4, could you try the patch of Bug#1031640?

Thanks

Comment 6

[孟宪茂]

(In reply to Vance Chen [:vchen][[e-mail]] from comment #5)
> Hi Xianmao -
> 
> As Shawn mentioned in Comment#4, could you try the patch of Bug#1031640?
> 
> Thanks

I have got the patch for test,I will provide the result latter.

Thank you for your kindly help!

Comment 7

[孟宪茂]

Hi shawn & Vance，

The patch in comment5 works fine，so we can close this bug.
Thanks for your help!