Closed Bug 1082205 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

xperf is permaorange on mozilla-beta, " mainthreadio | File '{profile}\pluginreg.dat.tmp' was accessed and we were not expecting it"

Categories

(Testing :: Talos, defect)

34 Branch
x86
Windows 7
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: philor, Assigned: jmaher)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Aaron,

this was live on aurora, but now with the uplift to beta we have problems; any idea why we would have that?

:philor, you do not need to close the tree for this; we can add this to a whitelist, although it would be nice to know why we see this only on beta.
Flags: needinfo?(aklotz)
Oh, okay. Did you want me to hide xperf on beta instead of closing the tree, then? Those are your choices, there's no "oh, we'll just leave the known permaorange there and look at it every time to see whether it's different permaorange or just the same permaorange" option.
lets hide xperf for now;
Done.
Severity: blocker → normal
so it appears we have some new files between this bug and bug 1081354:
* "{profile}\\pluginreg.dat.tmp": {}
* all parent dirs of the profile
* I am ignoring these from bug 1081354:
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | mainthreadio | File '{profile}\startupcache\startupcache.4.little' was accessed and we were not expecting it: 'Duration 11.795327 > 1.0'
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | mainthreadio | File '{profile}\telemetry.shutdowntime.txt.tmp' was accessed and we were not expecting it: 'Duration 11.386187 > 1.0'
TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | mainthreadio | File '{profile}' was accessed and we were not expecting it: 'Duration 6.583649 > 1.0'

those 3 errors are related to Duration, not to access; should we allow those durations to be larger?
Assignee: nobody → jmaher
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8504809 - Flags: review?(aklotz)
Comment on attachment 8504809 [details] [diff] [review]
whitelist more files in mainthread io (1.0)

Review of attachment 8504809 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry for the delay.
Attachment #8504809 - Flags: review?(aklotz) → review+
It's a reasonable file to whitelist, but I'm not sure why we're only seeing it now.
Flags: needinfo?(aklotz)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: