13:48 <•edmorley> mdoglio: do logger.error()s appear in newrelic? 13:49 <•edmorley> mdoglio: I'm presuming not? 13:49 <•mdoglio> no it doesn;t 13:50 <•edmorley> mdoglio: should we come up with a way to do so, or do you think it's not worth it? 13:50 <•mdoglio> edmorley: don't think it's worth it 13:50 <•mdoglio> edmorley: I would prefer to have a central place to write logs to, so that we can keep it under control 13:51 <•mdoglio> we now have too many machines to log into each and read the logs 13:51 <•edmorley> mdoglio: yeah I agree on that 13:51 <•mdoglio> we probably have already something in place for it but we don't know 13:51 <•mdoglio> it wouldn't surprise me at all
Do you have any suggestions for ways to do this/does Mozilla already have a tool/dashboard for this? :-)
Looks like we're going to try to put together logstash, or an equivalent, in 2015. Would it be sufficient to have all of the raw logs in one place, a la syslog?
(In reply to Kendall Libby [:fubar] from comment #2) > Looks like we're going to try to put together logstash, or an equivalent, in > 2015. Would it be sufficient to have all of the raw logs in one place, a la > syslog? Yeah I think anything would be better than the current situation :-)
Priority: -- → P2
Component: Treeherder → Treeherder: Infrastructure
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Duplicate of bug: 1151800
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.