Closed
Bug 1090762
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Add telemetry for FTP usage
Categories
(Core Graveyard :: Networking: FTP, defect, P3)
Core Graveyard
Networking: FTP
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1579507
People
(Reporter: jduell.mcbugs, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [necko-backlog])
Attachments
(1 file)
2.71 KB,
patch
|
jduell.mcbugs
:
feedback+
mcmanus
:
feedback-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We want to get a sense of how often FTP is still being used. I'm thinking two metrics are good enough here: 1) Did we use FTP one or more times in the current browser session? 2) Did we use FTP directory listings specifically? (vs just downloading a file from a link) If daily usage is possible, that's nicer, but even per session would be a start.
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → daniel
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
First shot. This adds two counters, FTP_CONNECT for "connect" (including the use of a cached version) and FTP_LIST for counting actual directory listing commands used. As a complete Telemetry newbie, I of course welcome all and any feedback.
Attachment #8515911 -
Flags: feedback?(jduell.mcbugs)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8515911 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-bug-1090762-Add-telemetry-for-FTP-usage-r-jduell.patch Review of attachment 8515911 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Patrick, do you have an opinion here? I was thinking we'd try to break down FTP usage not just by absolute #s but by the % of browser sessions (or % of days when a user uses FTP).
Attachment #8515911 -
Flags: feedback?(mcmanus)
Attachment #8515911 -
Flags: feedback?(jduell.mcbugs)
Attachment #8515911 -
Flags: feedback+
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
we can add telemetry, sure. but the question I always ask is at what # or percentage is it ok to require an add-on?
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8515911 [details] [diff] [review] 0001-bug-1090762-Add-telemetry-for-FTP-usage-r-jduell.patch Review of attachment 8515911 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- this patch doesn't give us any comparables (pct of sessions for example..) its just a raw hit count - which I don't see how it helps us. don't get me wrong, there is a lot of code in the ftp directory that is lightly used and highly risky.. it would be good to get rid of. I worry about the competitive aspect. Could we work with an add-on author to distribute a js based ftp implementation already written?
Attachment #8515911 -
Flags: feedback?(mcmanus) → feedback-
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
I think kind: "flag" is the type of probe we need here.
Updated•8 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [necko-active]
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: daniel → nobody
Whiteboard: [necko-active] → [necko-backlog]
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Bulk change to priority: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1399258
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
Bulk change to priority: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1399258
Priority: P1 → P3
Comment 10•5 years ago
|
||
Can't this be duped to bug 1579507, which is now done?
Flags: needinfo?(nhnguyen)
Updated•5 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(nhnguyen)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•2 months ago
|
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•