Open
Bug 1092744
Opened 11 years ago
Updated 3 years ago
Saving attachment file should use Downloads.jsm directly to make saved files items more informative
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Attachments, enhancement)
MailNews Core
Attachments
Tracking
(Not tracked)
NEW
People
(Reporter: hiro, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [patchlove])
Attachments
(1 file, 5 obsolete files)
|
21.42 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We can put more important information on the download manager view.
For example, sender of attachment file is one of the important information.
Attaching patch shows sender info in the view.
| Reporter | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Implemented MsgDownloads.saveAllAttachments.
Attachment #8515603 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Used also Downloads.jsm on detaching.
Attachment #8517977 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Added received date property for future reference.
Attachment #8518084 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8518109 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [patchlove]
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Patch unbitrotted and const changed to var.
Aceman, does this patch look complete as it is? I'm thinking of adding a reference to the message to jump to the message from download item and maybe also adding the subject. But this is something for a followup bug.
Attachment #8518772 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8687689 -
Flags: review?(acelists)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8687689 [details] [diff] [review]
MsgDownload_jsm.patch
I see now with this patch the saved attachments aren't shown in the list after a restart of TB (removing the patch and opening TB shows them again).
Attachment #8687689 -
Flags: review?(acelists)
Does anybody know what this does? Is MsgDownloads.jsm some new code from m-c that migrates us more to the new downloads backend used in FF?
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Not sure. A brief glance doesn't suggest it's a migrator - looks more like mail-specific utility functions that wrap Downloads.jsm. Hiro can probably tell us for sure.
Flags: needinfo?(mconley) → needinfo?(hiikezoe)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Yes, Downloads.jsm has a capability which stores additional information. Sender name is an example.
Other examples:
* sent date: it does not equal to saved date.
* message subject: if the subject is shown in download list, user can easily find the original message which contained the attachment file, or find other attachment files in the same message.
Flags: needinfo?(hiikezoe)
Updated•6 years ago
|
Summary: Saving attachment file should use Downloads.jsm directly → Saving attachment file should use Downloads.jsm directly to make saved files items more informative
Updated•3 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•