Closed
Bug 1094452
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Request: Please rebuild HTML documentation tree to reflect HTML5's new status
Categories
(developer.mozilla.org Graveyard :: General, defect)
developer.mozilla.org Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: sheppy, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Now that HTML has moved to recommendation status, everywhere our version info macros indicate that it's PR is out of date. Please trigger a rebuild of the subtree starting at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML as soon as is practicable, to update all of these references. Thanks!
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Unfortunately there are too many pages to regenerate all of them by hand.
Flags: needinfo?(lcrouch)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Summary: Request: Please rebuild HTML documentation tree → Request: Please rebuild HTML documentation tree to reflect HTML5's new status
Updated•10 years ago
|
Severity: normal → major
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
There's a `render_document` management command we can use for this [1], which already includes the ability to run: python manage.py render_document /en-US/docs/HTML Looks like the stage server also has the full HTML tree available, so we can rehearse the command there: https://developer.allizom.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML [1] https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/blob/master/kuma/wiki/management/commands/render_document.py
Flags: needinfo?(lcrouch)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
:jezdez - can you file a bug under this to add or change code to use the new celery chord & group code?
Flags: needinfo?(jezdez)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, I've talked to :robhudson in detail and have formed a few ideas, depending how much work we want to invest in this. Currently the management command schedules rendering tasks immediately when using the --defer command line option. That translates to executing those rendering tasks in parallel on all three workers and a guarantees a DDoS via the kumascript/kuma request/response cycle. There are a few options we can implement to make sure that scheduling those tasks doesn't lead to a DDoS: 1. extend the management command to use a Celery chain to make sure the rendering tasks are executed sequentially wrapped in a chord with a callback that reports when the rendering is done Pro: Simple to develop Con: Will take as long as actually running the management command without the defer CLI option, probably very long 2. use the rate-limit ability of celery to rate-limit a task per worker instance to a sensible amount per time unit and use a Celery task group for running the rendering tasks in parallel but under control to reduce risk of overwhelm Pro: improved scalability and potentially speed Contra: hard to guess how many tasks can kuma/kumascript take, so not clear how big the rate-limiting should be, also hard to test outside of prod environment due to missing dev/stage/prod parity 3. use a separate Celery queue to separate task execution from other of Celery tasks, with a hard lock of the number of tasks and/or time of processing, a.k.a. "global" rate-limit Pro: best isolation from other important Celery tasks such as email sending. other tasks could profit from that as well, e.g. have a separate "render" queue just for rendering docs Contra: ops intensive as it requires separate celery worker process setup, including dev environment setup Obviously the main reason to decide for one of the options above (and they could easily be combined as well) is constraints on developer time. That's outside my jurisdiction though ;)
Flags: needinfo?(jezdez)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → robhudson.mozbugs
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
In a meeting this morning we decided to go with option 1 for now. Option 3 is attractive but we will save that for later if/when we add a self-service option for rebuilding subtrees. In addition to option 1 we will add tasks in the chain that send emails to mdn-dev@ after each 20% of the tasks are processed and once again when everything is complete.
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/kuma https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/b8fc1b41e7ceb7c43f6fe0d1839661aeef26c3df Bug 1094452 - Convert render_document command to use chain https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/c917d99252d07cb654b5cc6463da509bb4cb148c Merge pull request #3100 from robhudson/1094452-render Bug 1094452 - Convert render_document command to use chain
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/kuma https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/43de314f85500cc3e7c146c6792c1aeb5ea006a6 Bug 1094452 - Fix date comparison in query https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/2c0d5be1741abbf1b61ffc62c7f99f5f8ea7a4b2 Merge pull request #3111 from robhudson/fix-date-comparison Bug 1094452 - Fix date comparison in query
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Commits pushed to master at https://github.com/mozilla/kuma https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/12331eda798220ebb25bbe63a45d281e3122ec0b Bug 1094452 - Fix call to document render with pk https://github.com/mozilla/kuma/commit/bb9cd3c084b0a7454bef66ea2ad7d6563beb65d5 Merge pull request #3114 from robhudson/render-fix Bug 1094452 - Fix call to document render with pk
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
I sadly never was able to focus on general search improvements.
Assignee: robhudson → nobody
Comment 10•4 years ago
|
||
MDN Web Docs' bug reporting has now moved to GitHub. From now on, please file content bugs at https://github.com/mdn/sprints/issues/ and platform bugs at https://github.com/mdn/kuma/issues/.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Updated•4 years ago
|
Product: developer.mozilla.org → developer.mozilla.org Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•