Closed Bug 1104764 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

[Rooms][Settings] Delete rooms

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Loop, defect)

All
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: crdlc, Assigned: crdlc)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

61 bytes, text/x-github-pull-request
borjasalguero
: review+
oteo
: feedback+
Details | Review
No description provided.
Assignee: nobody → opatinobugzilla
The first part (cleaning all rooms) is completed, but I have doubts about cleaning only revoked urls. Is it the correct choice to search between revoked urls those that are rooms and then delete them? Or should I implement a revoking urls system for only rooms?
Flags: needinfo?(crdlc)
Please, do not work on this bug, let's wait Cristian to come back from his holidays. As I commented last week, I agreed with Jorge that this feature could be decrepaded from 1.1.1 version. Depending on the server bug progress (bug 1106562) we will address or not the "Clean all Rooms" part.
Assignee: opatinobugzilla → nobody
We can talk offline about this today
Flags: needinfo?(crdlc)
Assignee: nobody → crdlc
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attached file Github pull request
Attachment #8545284 - Flags: feedback?(oteo)
Attachment #8545284 - Flags: review?(borja.bugzilla)
Borja the API is only available in development |grunt build --loopServer=development|
Depends on: 1106562
Comment on attachment 8545284 [details] [review] Github pull request I have tested the branch with your patch and it's working fine, just remember to change the confirmation string. According to the WF the string would be: "Are you sure you want to clean your rooms?" (without "all") I have already confirmed with Monica that we can delete in the "Clear all rooms" button the "(active and expired)" string as we are not going to implement the Clear all expired rooms button in this release. So it's fine that string in your implementation. Thanks a lot!
Attachment #8545284 - Flags: feedback?(oteo) → feedback+
Be aware that we can not land this patch until the API change (bug 1106562) is uplifted to Production in 0.15.0 version
Changing this right now (In reply to Maria Angeles Oteo (:oteo) from comment #6) > Comment on attachment 8545284 [details] [review] > Github pull request > > I have tested the branch with your patch and it's working fine, just > remember to change the confirmation string. > > According to the WF the string would be: "Are you sure you want to clean > your rooms?" (without "all") > > I have already confirmed with Monica that we can delete in the "Clear all > rooms" button the "(active and expired)" string as we are not going to > implement the Clear all expired rooms button in this release. So it's fine > that string in your implementation. > > Thanks a lot!
Finally according to MA and UX: deleteAllRoomsConfirmation = Are you sure you want to clean all your rooms? deleteAllRoomsConfirmation = ¿Estás seguro de que quieres eliminar todas las rooms? just in case Borja thinks that Cristian got crazy after saying that he will remove the "all" word XD
Comment on attachment 8545284 [details] [review] Github pull request Great job! Thanks!
Attachment #8545284 - Flags: review?(borja.bugzilla) → review+
Hi Maria, the patch has been reviewed and ready to be landed, so please let me know when the new API is in production please (In reply to Maria Angeles Oteo (:oteo) from comment #7) > Be aware that we can not land this patch until the API change (bug 1106562) > is uplifted to Production in 0.15.0 version
Flags: needinfo?(oteo)
I talked with Remy about it last Friday. He confirmed that this week the O.15.0 version will be tagged so at the beginning of next week that server version should be uplifted to Production. We can not land our patch (bug 1104764) in Loop application until bug 1106562 is uplifted to Production Server. Setting ni to Rémy and Alexis so they can be aware that we need this patch (bug 1106562) to be uplifted to Production for the Loop mobile version as soon as possible. Thanks a lot!
Flags: needinfo?(rhubscher)
Flags: needinfo?(oteo)
Flags: needinfo?(alexis+bugs)
That should be the case yes!
Flags: needinfo?(rhubscher)
Flags: needinfo?(alexis+bugs)
Blocks: 1121988
No longer blocks: 1121988
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: