Closed Bug 1111149 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Move TestArray.cpp to gtest and enable it

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla37

People

(Reporter: ehsan.akhgari, Assigned: ehsan.akhgari)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached patch Patch (v1)Splinter Review
No description provided.
Attachment #8535957 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Comment on attachment 8535957 [details] [diff] [review] Patch (v1) Review of attachment 8535957 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: xpcom/glue/tests/gtest/TestArray.cpp @@ -70,5 @@ > -{ > - if (aValue1 == aValue2) { > - return "OK"; > - } > - if (kExitOnError) { You should remove the kExitOnError variable, too. @@ +152,5 @@ > array->RemoveLastElement(foo); > int32_t removeResult4[9] = {0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9}; > + CheckArray(array, 9, removeResult4, 9); > + > + foo = nullptr; Is this really necessary? The presence or absence of |foo| shouldn't affect the tests below, so can't we just let it autorelease at the end of the function?
Attachment #8535957 - Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
(In reply to Nathan Froyd (:froydnj) from comment #1) > @@ +152,5 @@ > > array->RemoveLastElement(foo); > > int32_t removeResult4[9] = {0, 1, 2, 4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9}; > > + CheckArray(array, 9, removeResult4, 9); > > + > > + foo = nullptr; > > Is this really necessary? The presence or absence of |foo| shouldn't affect > the tests below, so can't we just let it autorelease at the end of the > function? The number of refs is explicitly tested, so yes this is necessary. The old version of the test called Release() manually.
Ah, gCount, right. Carry on!
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla37
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: