Closed
Bug 1114624
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Don't register the legacy nsIDownloadManager implementation of nsITransfer by default anymore
Categories
(Toolkit :: Downloads API, defect)
Toolkit
Downloads API
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla38
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox38 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: Paolo, Assigned: Paolo)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
Now that all the core applications have migrated to Downloads.jsm, we should actively remove uses of nsIDownloadManager. The first step is to register the JavaScript implementation of nsITransfer, avoiding to register the legacy nsIDownloadManager implementation and letting external applications do that if needed. The override required in applications that still use nsIDownloadManager would be implemented at startup using a technique similar to the one removed by the patch. The legacy CID and the contract ID are defined as NS_DOWNLOAD_CID and NS_TRANSFER_CONTRACTID, and they are "{b02be33b-d47c-4bd3-afd9-402a942426b0}" and "@mozilla.org/transfer;1" respectively.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(mak77)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(fabrice)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(mar.castelluccio)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Review requested for Firefox, Firefox OS, Firefox for Android, and the Webapp Runtime. Firefox for Windows 8 Metro is already unsupported, and will need to be updated to Downloads.jsm for downloads to work. This patch does not deal with Metro code. We should not wait to review and test this, but we should wait some time before landing, since people might want to land corresponding patches in Thunderbird and SeaMonkey to implement the override. If they're not packaging the "jsdownloads" folder, they might be able to just add a line in a manifest file.
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Review of attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Fails on b2g when downloading: Timestamp: 12/22/2014 10:25:52 AM Error: [Exception... "Method not implemented'Method not implemented' when calling method: [nsIFilePicker::init]" nsresult: "0x80004001 (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)" location: "JS frame :: file:///home/fabrice/dev/builds/obj-b2g-desktop-b2g-inbound/dist/bin/components/nsHelperAppDlg.js :: nsUnknownContentTypeDialog.prototype.promptForSaveToFileAsync/< :: line 259" data: no] Source File: resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm -> resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js Line: 873
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(fabrice) → review-
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Fabrice Desré [:fabrice] from comment #2) > Fails on b2g when downloading: > > Timestamp: 12/22/2014 10:25:52 AM > Error: [Exception... "Method not implemented'Method not implemented' when > calling method: [nsIFilePicker::init]" nsresult: "0x80004001 > (NS_ERROR_NOT_IMPLEMENTED)" location: "JS frame :: > file:///home/fabrice/dev/builds/obj-b2g-desktop-b2g-inbound/dist/bin/ > components/nsHelperAppDlg.js :: > nsUnknownContentTypeDialog.prototype.promptForSaveToFileAsync/< :: line 259" > data: no] > Source File: resource://gre/modules/Promise.jsm -> > resource://gre/modules/Promise-backend.js > Line: 873 That's curious, it looks like we're calling the Desktop implementation of nsIHelperAppLauncherDialog. The registration of this interface should not be affected by this patch, maybe there is something involved indirectly. Fabrice, do you have any idea of what might be going on?
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(fabrice)
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the slow review. I tried applying this patch to test on Android, but it failed to apply.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Don't worry. You may need to apply the patch from bug 1114614, or ignore the Desktop conflicts.
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Review of attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- /mobile changes look fine.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Review of attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- please ensure to get a green Try run out of this.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(mak77) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Fabrice, can you please confirm that the error in comment 2 is not an artifact of a partial build? Not sure if Firefox OS can do clobber builds, but would be worth trying. Unfortunately I don't think this code path is covered by regression tests.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review- → review?(fabrice)
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Full try build to check for build issues: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/ui/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=014c97bafa11
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Marco, do you have time to look at this for the Webapp Runtime? We should try to land when we have all the reviews.
Flags: needinfo?(mar.castelluccio)
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Paolo Amadini from comment #10) > Hi Marco, do you have time to look at this for the Webapp Runtime? > > We should try to land when we have all the reviews. Myk is also qualified to review this if Marco isn't around.
Flags: needinfo?(myk)
Assignee | ||
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Thanks! Adding as a possible reviewer.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(myk)
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Review of attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I wanted to fix the webapprt download tests before this. Looks good to me, but could you run "./mach webapprt-test-chrome" to make sure there's no regressions in the downloads tests?
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(myk)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(mar.castelluccio)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(mar.castelluccio)
Assignee | ||
Comment 14•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] from comment #13) > I wanted to fix the webapprt download tests before this. Looks good to me, > but could you run "./mach webapprt-test-chrome" to make sure there's no > regressions in the downloads tests? Running this command on Mac OS X without the patch after a clobber build results in the error "Unable to parse environment files for application startup". It seems it's trying to use the installed Firefox instead of Nightly. I see there were bugs related to the new bundle structure, but these are expected to be solved by now, so this may be a different issue. How can I work around it?
Comment 15•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Paolo Amadini from comment #14) > Running this command on Mac OS X without the patch after a clobber build > results in the error "Unable to parse environment files for application > startup". It seems it's trying to use the installed Firefox instead of > Nightly. Yes, we have an issue with the way we look for the Firefox installation that can cause the tests to use a different Firefox installation than the one you built. And that could trigger the message you saw, which is bug 1087362. For details, see bug 914754. > I see there were bugs related to the new bundle structure, but > these are expected to be solved by now, so this may be a different issue. > How can I work around it? You can temporarily move your other Firefox installations to the Trash. I typically select them in Finder, press Cmd+Backspace to move them to the Trash, run the tests, and then press Cmd+Z to undo the move.
Flags: needinfo?(myk)
Assignee | ||
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Myk Melez [:myk] [@mykmelez] from comment #15) > You can temporarily move your other Firefox installations to the Trash. I > typically select them in Finder, press Cmd+Backspace to move them to the > Trash, run the tests, and then press Cmd+Z to undo the move. This doesn't work for me, simply no runtime is found. Do you think you can test the patch on your system while waiting for bug 914754 to be fixed? With regard to bug 1087362, which I found previously but seemed to describe a different situation, let me know there if I can help by providing more information, but I wouldn't block landing this bug on fixing the webapprt tests.
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
I can test the patch on my system, but there are some conflicts when I try to apply it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
This should apply cleanly.
Assignee: nobody → paolo.mozmail
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 19•9 years ago
|
||
Tests are passing!
Assignee | ||
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Marco Castelluccio [:marco] from comment #19) > Tests are passing! Thanks for checking!
Assignee | ||
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8549689 [details] [diff] [review] On latest trunk Hi aus, Fabrice found an error when testing this patch in comment 2 but I'm not sure whether that can be due to an issue with his local build. Do you have some spare cycles to check whether this is a real issue on your system?
Attachment #8549689 -
Flags: review?(aus)
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
:Paolo, I'll try and give it spin over the weekend.
Assignee | ||
Comment 23•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ghislain Aus Lacroix [:aus] from comment #22) > :Paolo, I'll try and give it spin over the weekend. Thank you!
Updated•9 years ago
|
Blocks: cc-backlog
Assignee | ||
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Upon suggestion from Francisco I tried this manually on a Simulator build on Windows and I don't see any Console error during downloads. When the download finishes, the Simulator says that the file cannot be found on the device, but this is not a regression from this patch as the same issue happens on a Nightly build.
Flags: needinfo?(fabrice)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(fabrice) → review?(francisco)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8549689 -
Flags: review?(aus)
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Hei Fabrice, I think you are better than me to review this, looks simple change though ;)
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(francisco) → review?(fabrice)
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review] The patch Review of attachment 8540183 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Tested on device, works fine.
Attachment #8540183 -
Flags: review?(fabrice) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/rev/afbba6c11b19
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8549689 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/afbba6c11b19
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox38:
--- → fixed
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla38
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•