Closed Bug 1114884 Opened 9 years ago Closed 6 years ago

There should be different approach for handling different storage threshold

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(feature-b2g:2.5+, b2g-v2.0 affected, b2g-v2.0M affected, b2g-v2.1 affected, b2g-v2.2 affected)

RESOLVED WONTFIX
feature-b2g 2.5+
Tracking Status
b2g-v2.0 --- affected
b2g-v2.0M --- affected
b2g-v2.1 --- affected
b2g-v2.2 --- affected

People

(Reporter: jocheng, Unassigned, NeedInfo)

References

Details

FFOS should handle storage in following 3 different level:

1. Storage available
2. Low storage (Just warning, device still functioning)
3. No storage (If user do not clean data,device will not functioning)

Partner should be able to customize threshold value for item 2 and 3 in order to fulfill devices with different storage.
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:
This is highly request by partner. We should implement this as early as possible.
blocking-b2g: --- → 3.0?
Blocks: LowStorage
We should definitely fix this.
I guess we need some UX around level 2 and 3.

We should also make sure for that the basic functionality is still working for level 3 (starting the phone and making phone calls) but thats probably for another bug.
Flags: needinfo?(firefoxos-ux-bugzilla)
This feature is not included in the roadmap of v3 partner features (see Aha). This should be assigned to the UX lead after it's decided if this is happening, though we'll likely have to wait for more staff, as all the UX people who would take this are no longer with Mozilla.
Flags: needinfo?(firefoxos-ux-bugzilla)
Rob, adding you to this since I won't be here, in case it comes up again.
Flags: needinfo?(rmacdonald)
No longer blocks: Woodduck
Hi Rob,
We need your help for UX design on low storage situation as this is in 2.5 scope.
Thanks!
blocking-b2g: 2.5? → 2.5+
(In reply to Josh Cheng [:josh] from comment #6)
> Hi Rob,
> We need your help for UX design on low storage situation as this is in 2.5
> scope.
> Thanks!

Looks like this should get feature+ instead of blocking+ from bug 1167167. 

It is also clear to me which team will be responsible of this feature since this is listed as a 2.5 feature without a team/EM in the spreadsheet! ni'ing Gregor in case this falls into either of the teams as a late requirement.
Flags: needinfo?(anygregor)
blocking-b2g: 2.5+ → ---
feature-b2g: --- → 2.5+
Flags: needinfo?(anygregor)
> It is also clear

It is also "unclear to me..."
Flags: needinfo?(tchen)
Flags: needinfo?(tchen)
Firefox OS is not being worked on
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.