Closed Bug 1119172 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago
[Flame][Download Manager]When we open the downloaded PDF file, the file is displayed as blank and "X" button doesn't work
[1.Description]: [Flame][v2.2][Download Manager]Download a PDF file from website. After download completes, tap the PDF file from Notification bar to open it. the PDF file is displayed as blank, and the "x" button doesn't work. See Attachment: logcat_1630.txt & Video.MP4 Found time: 16:30 [2.Testing Steps]: 1. Launch Browser. 2. Type in the URL: http://apps.irs.gov/app/picklist/list/formsInstructions.html. 3. Search and select the PDF File to download it. 4. After download completes, tap to open it. 5. Tap the "x" button to close the PDF file. [3.Expected Result]: 4. The content of PDF file could be displayed , 5. PDF file should be closed by tapping "x" button. [4.Actual Result]: 4. The PDF file is displayed as blank. 5. The "x" button doesn't work, we can not close the PDF file by tapping "x" button. [5.Reproduction build]: Flame 2.2 build: Gaia-Rev 69ac77cfa938fae2763ac426a80ca6e5feb6ad25 Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/33781a3a5201 Build-ID 20150107010216 Version 37.0a1 [6.Reproduction Frequency]: Always Recurrence,5/5 [7.TCID]: Free test [8.Note]: After kill apps via task manager, it will enter PDF screen, user have to recover it by reboot device.
Smae here, build 20150113011037 Some files work, others won't, without me knowing what could be the reason (no logic of file size, etc.)
Hi Shine, Could you help to try this on v2.1 and v2.0, thank you.
Hi Eric, This problem is verified pass on latest build of Flame2.0/2.1 1. On Flame 2.0, open the PDF file, the content can be displayed; after open PDF file, there’s no “x” button, so I can’t repro the problem of “The "x" button doesn't work” 2. On Flame 2.1, open the PDF file, the content can be displayed, tap “x” button, it can close the PDF file successfully. See attachment: Flame2.0_video.MP4 Reproduce rate 0/10 Flame 2.0 build: Gaia-Rev 2989f2b2bd12fcc0e9c017d2db766e76a55873b8 Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/ffb9925dd084 Build-ID 20150125000204 Version 32.0 Device-Name flame FW-Release 4.4.2 FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20150125.033105 FW-Date Sun Jan 25 03:31:16 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 Flame 2.1 build: Gaia-Rev 2055fc40a8bd2af1908979cb45da6b7d1c4ced0b Gecko-Rev https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/38ac70ca969b Build-ID 20150122001404 Version 34.0 Device-Name flame FW-Release 4.4.2 FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20150122.034705 FW-Date Thu Jan 22 03:47:16 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0
Thanks, set 2.2? for regression. (In reply to Shine from comment #5) > Created attachment 8554386 [details] > Flame2.0 video > > Hi Eric, > This problem is verified pass on latest build of Flame2.0/2.1 > 1. On Flame 2.0, open the PDF file, the content can be displayed; after open > PDF file, there’s no “x” button, so I can’t repro the problem of “The "x" > button doesn't work” > 2. On Flame 2.1, open the PDF file, the content can be displayed, tap “x” > button, it can close the PDF file successfully. > See attachment: Flame2.0_video.MP4 > Reproduce rate 0/10 > > Flame 2.0 build: > Gaia-Rev 2989f2b2bd12fcc0e9c017d2db766e76a55873b8 > Gecko-Rev > https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g32_v2_0/rev/ffb9925dd084 > Build-ID 20150125000204 > Version 32.0 > Device-Name flame > FW-Release 4.4.2 > FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20150125.033105 > FW-Date Sun Jan 25 03:31:16 EST 2015 > Bootloader L1TC000118D0 > > Flame 2.1 build: > Gaia-Rev 2055fc40a8bd2af1908979cb45da6b7d1c4ced0b > Gecko-Rev > https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/38ac70ca969b > Build-ID 20150122001404 > Version 34.0 > Device-Name flame > FW-Release 4.4.2 > FW-Incremental eng.cltbld.20150122.034705 > FW-Date Thu Jan 22 03:47:16 EST 2015 > Bootloader L1TC000118D0
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.2?
Triage is blocking because this is a regression.
blocking-b2g: 2.2? → 2.2+
Depends on: 1119157
Hi Cervantes, can you take a look? So this can be fixed after bug 1119157 is fixed?
Cervantes, do you have any suggested next action plan? Thanks.
If you want to confirm whether this is a duplicate of bug 1119157 then I would suggest taking the its current patch to produce a build to verify. If it is a duplicate then it will be fixed along with 1119157.
Hi Cervantes, can you help to apply the patch of bug 1119157 and test this bug? The bug 1119157 is 2.2+ but this one says 2.1 unaffected? If this is dup to 1119157, this should be 2.1+ also.
It looks like the same bug to me. Duplicate this bug to 1119157. We can reopen if the problem remains after 1119157 is fixed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Duplicate of bug: 1119157
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.