Closed
Bug 1128287
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
Intermittent testFindInPage | testFindInPage.js - r == - See following stack:
Categories
(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: Testing, defect, P3)
Tracking
(firefox38 fixed)
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
Firefox 38
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox38 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: philor, Assigned: rricard)
References
Details
(Keywords: intermittent-failure, regression, Whiteboard: [leave open])
Attachments
(4 files, 7 obsolete files)
142.15 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
4.38 KB,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
2.74 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
902 bytes,
patch
|
Margaret
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Related to bug 1015395?
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
You probably have a race condition here. The test is trying to search for a string "Robocop" for example. I'm guessing the |mActions.sendKeys(text);| will send your search string to the FindInPage input field a character at a time. Depending on how slow it is / how large a delay between char entry, FindInPage tries to execute partial searchs. So the initial test looking for Robocoop won't find that string, but will match other partial occurences of 'r', or 'ro' as indicated by the failures above. (we don't do match case yet). Take a look, but I'm guessing that your first |assertSelection(document);| fails because *something* is selected, and that test as specified, tries to ensure *nothing* is selected.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
Hey robin, not sure of your nick, are you looking at this?
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
Hum, I should definitely take a look at this indeed. Thanks for pointing it out to me ! I think that relying on the repaint to resolve the promise is not good enough. We should send a message back from Java to JS but I don't really know how to do that for now ... And I still have some things to finish before being able to look at this properly. Note: you can find me on IRC, my nick is rricard (when I am there ...)
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ricard.robin
Assignee | ||
Comment 30•9 years ago
|
||
Hi margaret, I need some information from you ! We discussed with capella on how to fix this. It appears that hooking the promise resolution to MozAfterRepaint introduces an intermittent bug. I was proposing (as you did at first) to hook it to a Java to JS message. As before, I'm not able to see how to do it (if you can give me some references in the MXR, that would be great ! :)) You can see my discussion with capella here: http://logs.glob.uno/?c=mozilla%23mobile&s=4+Feb+2015&e=4+Feb+2015#c416261
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 34•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robin Ricard [rricard] from comment #30) > Hi margaret, I need some information from you ! We discussed with capella on > how to fix this. It appears that hooking the promise resolution to > MozAfterRepaint introduces an intermittent bug. I was proposing (as you did > at first) to hook it to a Java to JS message. As before, I'm not able to see > how to do it (if you can give me some references in the MXR, that would be > great ! :)) > > You can see my discussion with capella here: > http://logs.glob.uno/?c=mozilla%23mobile&s=4+Feb+2015&e=4+Feb+2015#c416261 I think that what you can do is instead of using sendRequest to send the "Test:FindInPage" message, you can use sendRequestForResult, and wait until you get a result in JS before continuing with the test. We may still want to keep the "MozAfterPaint" event listener to make sure the page also paints after we're done entering the text. Perhaps we can use a Promise.all for this. Using sendRequestForResult will involve modifying testFindInPage to implement NativeEventListener instead of GeckoEventListener: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/base/util/NativeEventListener.java#11 You should search in the tree for examples of where we use sendRequestForResult to see the pattern in action. Also, I must have missed this in my last review, but I think we no longer need the logic in testFindInPage to scroll the page: http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/base/tests/testFindInPage.java#88 That might also be contributing to some intermittent issues, so we should remove it if we don't need it.
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 41•9 years ago
|
||
Okay thanks, I'll try to get a patch ASAP !
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•9 years ago
|
||
And we still need to keep the logic to scroll the page: it is used to select next matches and I assert that in the selection.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 60•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, hum I have a patch but it doesn't seem to work. i'm trying to see what's happening there but well ... I'll get you on IRC !
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 62•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8562070 -
Flags: feedback?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 63•9 years ago
|
||
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 64•9 years ago
|
||
Don't rely on the repaint only but a return promise from the message.
Attachment #8562070 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8562070 -
Flags: feedback?(margaret.leibovic)
Attachment #8562238 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 65•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8562238 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8562238 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Attachment #8562762 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment 66•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robin Ricard [rricard] from comment #65) > Created attachment 8562762 [details] [diff] [review] > Try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=8ed2727fc1c5 I think there's something wrong with your try syntax, as no tests actually ran... Also, since this test runs as part of rc1 on 2.3 and rc2 on 4.0, you'll need to make sure to include both of those.
Blocks: 1015395
Keywords: regression
Reporter | ||
Comment 67•9 years ago
|
||
Needs to be -b o, since we don't even try to run robocop on debug builds.
Assignee | ||
Comment 68•9 years ago
|
||
oh ! sorry ! I didn't payed attention to this ...
Assignee | ||
Comment 69•9 years ago
|
||
here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=c22a996d8193
Comment 70•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robin Ricard [rricard] from comment #69) > here: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=c22a996d8193 I was wrong, we actually skip this on 2.3, so we don't need to run a test there. First pass was green on 4.0, I retriggered it a bunch of times to make sure there isn't a pesky orange hiding in there :)
Comment 71•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8562762 [details] [diff] [review] Try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=8ed2727fc1c5 Review of attachment 8562762 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good, I just have a few nits. I'd also like to make sure we have a useful error if this ever fails for some reason. r+ with nits addressed, and we can land an updated version if there aren't any oranges on the try run. ::: mobile/android/base/tests/testFindInPage.java @@ +10,5 @@ > import org.mozilla.gecko.Element; > import org.mozilla.gecko.R; > > import org.mozilla.gecko.EventDispatcher; > import org.mozilla.gecko.util.GeckoEventListener; You can remove this import now. @@ +41,5 @@ > if (event.equals("Test:CloseFindInPage")) { > try { > close.click(); > } catch (Exception e) { > + callback.sendError("FindInPage prompt not opened"); Nice, this is a good use of sendError. @@ +52,5 @@ > @Override > public void setUp() throws Exception { > super.setUp(); > > + EventDispatcher.getInstance().registerGeckoThreadListener((NativeEventListener)this, You shouldn't need this cast. ::: mobile/android/base/tests/testFindInPage.js @@ +41,5 @@ > + text: text, > + nrOfMatches: nrOfMatches > + }); > + let repaintPromise = promiseBrowserEvent(browser, "MozAfterPaint"); > + return Promise.all([messagePromise, repaintPromise]); What happens if one of these promises is rejected? Does the test fail with a useful error?
Attachment #8562762 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 72•9 years ago
|
||
ok, I fixed the nits and I'm testing if the error handling works correctly. I'll ping you when I have a patch
Assignee | ||
Comment 73•9 years ago
|
||
btw, I should start to work on IntelliJ to avoid those kind of dead imports but I can't figure out how to work inside the git tree with it.
Assignee | ||
Comment 74•9 years ago
|
||
Rely on multiple ends of find in page promises (Repaint and Java callback)
Attachment #8562762 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8562957 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 75•9 years ago
|
||
Rely on multiple ends of find in page promises (Repaint and Java callback)
Attachment #8562957 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8562957 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Attachment #8562960 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 77•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8562960 [details] [diff] [review] Intermittent testFindInPage | testFindInPage.js Review of attachment 8562960 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good. I can land this for you when the tree re-opens.
Attachment #8562960 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 80•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to TBPL Robot from comment #79) > log: > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?repo=fx-team&job_id=1988540 > repository: fx-team > start_time: 2015-02-12T17:05:21 > who: rvandermeulen[at]mozilla[dot]com > machine: panda-0286 > buildname: Android 4.0 armv7 API 11+ fx-team opt test robocop-2 > revision: 0b63903a6f41 > > TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage | GeckoEventExpecter - blockForEvent > timeout: Robocop:JS > 0 ERROR Exception caught during test! - > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage > | GeckoEventExpecter - blockForEvent timeout: Robocop:JS > TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage | Exception caught - > junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage > | GeckoEventExpecter - blockForEvent timeout: Robocop:JS > Return code: 1 > 02-12 17:45:02.343 E/GeckoLinker( 4487): > /data/data/com.adobe.flashplayer/lib/libysshared.so: Text relocations are > not supported What?! This push was supposed to fix this problem! rricard, do you think this is perhaps another issue?
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 81•9 years ago
|
||
This is new to me. the fail is different. Just guessing but I think that this could be triggered by the different timeouts in the findText[1] java method. [1]: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/mobile/android/base/tests/testFindInPage.java#65
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 84•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, no, doesn't seem like it was that.
> 17:35:10 INFO - testFindInPage.js | Now waiting for MozAfterPaint event from browser
> 17:35:10 WARNING - TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage | Exception caught - junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | testFindInPage | GeckoEventExpecter - blockForEvent timeout: Robocop:JS
In my opinion, there's no repaint triggered. If the repaint doesn't occur we should just wait a given time: Maybe use a Promise.race([repaintPromise, timeoutPromise]) should fix the problem.
Note: the repaint promise existed to ensure we waited long enough. But I can see cases where the repaint promise is registered after the emission of the MozAfterRepaint
Assignee | ||
Comment 85•9 years ago
|
||
Patch coming soon !
Assignee | ||
Comment 86•9 years ago
|
||
Okay ! Simple fix: I was creating the repaint promise after the message promise. This was wrong. Now I'm creating it before. No need for Promise.race for now I think.
Assignee | ||
Comment 87•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8564105 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 88•9 years ago
|
||
Can't push a try right now: tree is closed ...
Comment 89•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bab1f360bf44 Thanks for fixing this, it was driving me crazy :)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox38:
--- → fixed
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 38
Assignee | ||
Comment 90•9 years ago
|
||
Here's a try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1412677c7079
Assignee | ||
Comment 91•9 years ago
|
||
Wait ! We still have the second part of the bug to take care of !
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 93•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Robin Ricard [rricard] from comment #90) > Here's a try: > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1412677c7079 Thanks. Let me know when it finishes and I can retrigger the test runs for you if you don't have the permissions to do that.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
I had to back that out in https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/992cf3981ca8 for robocop-2 failures like https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=1994559&repo=fx-team
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 98•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, I'll see what I can do. I think I'll introduce the race condition anyway...
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin) → needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
(In reply to :Margaret Leibovic from comment #93) > (In reply to Robin Ricard [rricard] from comment #90) > > Here's a try: > > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1412677c7079 > > Thanks. Let me know when it finishes and I can retrigger the test runs for > you if you don't have the permissions to do that. And looking at that try run, this failure is in there.
(In reply to Wes Kocher (:KWierso) from comment #97) > I had to back that out in > https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/992cf3981ca8 for robocop-2 > failures like > https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=1994559&repo=fx-team Fixed a merge failure from the backout merge in https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/c899f3f1fb08
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Huh. Still failing after the backout?
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 116•9 years ago
|
||
Yep, if you want to neutralize it you should back out the bug that introduced the intermittent failure.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 120•9 years ago
|
||
As pointed out on IRC, MozAfterPaint seems to have disappeared from the mobile codebase. It may be never emitted, at all. https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=MozAfterPaint+path%3Amobile&case=true
Assignee | ||
Comment 121•9 years ago
|
||
Trying to blame a change on this, I found out that I'm the only one to use that on mobile. So I'm just going to read tons of logs to see what's wrong ...
Assignee | ||
Comment 122•9 years ago
|
||
That's the best I could do with my knowledge. Hope it does the job ...
Attachment #8564105 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8564105 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Attachment #8564553 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 123•9 years ago
|
||
And the try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=9eece2f7a930
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 124•9 years ago
|
||
Ok, I don't know what's going on here ... I'm trying everything but I end up stuck everytime ... :/
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 127•9 years ago
|
||
Bah, this is now perma-red across all trees :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 128•9 years ago
|
||
It was because of bug 1014113, now backed out. I'm responsible for both so I'll fix them ASAP ! :s
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 130•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8564553 [details] [diff] [review] Timeout race condition Review of attachment 8564553 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Do you have another try run to go along with this? And can you explain why we need this timeout? Is the issue that we're just not getting a MozAfterPaint event sometimes? Do you know why would that happen?
Assignee | ||
Comment 131•9 years ago
|
||
Nope, but it seems to be attached with bug 1014113. I'll retry intensively that with this patch applied on a 4.0 Emulator on my machine (where the perma rc2 was found). Yep, I thought that MozAfterPaint wasn't happening ... But it doesn't seem that's the issue (even if the logs are saying this to me: "Waiting for a MozAfterPaint then ... timeout !") I may need your expertise in logs to see if you spot something else causing this ...
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 142•9 years ago
|
||
Hey Robin, I'm sorry I haven't had time to help investigate this. I think we should consider disabling this test again if we can't come up with a solution in the near future.
Flags: needinfo?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment 143•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8564553 [details] [diff] [review] Timeout race condition Review of attachment 8564553 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Clearing review until we have a patch that's consistently green on try.
Attachment #8564553 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 145•9 years ago
|
||
Yep, ok, I'll do it. Sorry for not being really active those last days but I started a new part-time job and it'll be harder for me to contribute unfortunately.
Assignee | ||
Comment 146•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8573287 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment 147•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review] Disable testFindInPage Review of attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good, thanks. We should also uplift this to aurora.
Attachment #8573287 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment 148•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Margaret Leibovic from comment #147) > Comment on attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review] > Disable testFindInPage > > Review of attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Looks good, thanks. We should also uplift this to aurora. Please check in this latest patch to disable this test.
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 149•9 years ago
|
||
this failed to apply patching file mobile/android/base/tests/robocop.ini Hunk #1 FAILED at 30 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file mobile/android/base/tests/robocop.ini.rej patch failed, unable to continue (try -v) patch failed, rejects left in working dir errors during apply, please fix and refresh Bug-1128287---Disable-testFindInPage.patch
Flags: needinfo?(ricard.robin)
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 150•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review] Disable testFindInPage Review of attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: mobile/android/base/tests/robocop.ini @@ +40,2 @@ > # disabled on 2.3 > skip-if = android_version == "10" Also, please comment out this skip-if -- otherwise it will apply to the previous test, testFilterOpenTab: oops!
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 154•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8573287 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8574714 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Comment 155•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #150) > Comment on attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review] > Disable testFindInPage > > Review of attachment 8573287 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: mobile/android/base/tests/robocop.ini > @@ +40,2 @@ > > # disabled on 2.3 > > skip-if = android_version == "10" > > Also, please comment out this skip-if -- otherwise it will apply to the > previous test, testFilterOpenTab: oops! Thanks, gbrown! I'm embarrassed that I missed that.
Comment 156•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8574714 [details] [diff] [review] Disable testFindInPage Review of attachment 8574714 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: mobile/android/base/tests/robocop.ini @@ +36,5 @@ > skip-if = android_version == "10" > [testFilterOpenTab] > +# [testFindInPage] # see bug 1128287 > +# # disabled on 2.3 > +# skip-if = android_version == "10" You can just remove these skip-if lines altogether, instead of commenting them out.
Attachment #8574714 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 159•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8574714 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8575274 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic)
Assignee | ||
Comment 160•9 years ago
|
||
Side note: I'll be back in a few weeks to work on this ! ;)
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8575274 -
Flags: review?(margaret.leibovic) → review+
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 172•9 years ago
|
||
I needed to disable testFindInPage on Android 4.3 for the same type of failures; I noticed the disabling patch here never landed, so disabled testFindInPage across all versions in bug 1140148.
Comment 173•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Geoff Brown [:gbrown] from comment #172) > I needed to disable testFindInPage on Android 4.3 for the same type of > failures; I noticed the disabling patch here never landed, so disabled > testFindInPage across all versions in bug 1140148. Thanks, Geoff! Sorry for letting this slip through the cracks :(
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 176•8 years ago
|
||
Bulk assigning P3 to all open intermittent bugs without a priority set in Firefox components per bug 1298978.
Priority: -- → P3
Comment 177•3 years ago
|
||
We have completed our launch of our new Firefox on Android. The development of the new versions use GitHub for issue tracking. If the bug report still reproduces in a current version of [Firefox on Android nightly](https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.mozilla.fenix) an issue can be reported at the [Fenix GitHub project](https://github.com/mozilla-mobile/fenix/). If you want to discuss your report please use [Mozilla's chat](https://wiki.mozilla.org/Matrix#Connect_to_Matrix) server https://chat.mozilla.org and join the [#fenix](https://chat.mozilla.org/#/room/#fenix:mozilla.org) channel.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
Updated•3 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•