Discussion Forum: mozilla.appreview

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Infrastructure & Operations
MOC: Service Requests
RESOLVED FIXED
3 years ago
3 years ago

People

(Reporter: eviljeff, Assigned: sal)

Tracking

Details

(Reporter)

Description

3 years ago
List Name: mozilla.appreview
List Admin: lbrewster@mozilla.com, awilliamson@mozilla.com, atsay@mozilla.com, 

Short Description:
Discussion about Firefox Marketplace app reviews

Long Description:
Discussion about Firefox Marketplace app reviews

Justification / Special Instructions:

We have an existing list at app-reviewers@mozilla.org which is going to be deprecated in favour of this more open and searchable group.
Hi eviljeff,

Did you change from "app-reviewers" to "appreview" because the list is supposed to be open to more than just reviewers?

We already have a mozilla.webapps hierarchy; would mozilla.webapps.review make sense?

Gerv
(Reporter)

Comment 2

3 years ago
(In reply to Gervase Markham [:gerv] from comment #1)
> Hi eviljeff,
> 
> Did you change from "app-reviewers" to "appreview" because the list is
> supposed to be open to more than just reviewers?

In a way - its supposed to for developers to query the reviews they've received, and for us to more generally talk to the community about app review.  Its likely most of the participants will be still be reviewers, but we want to have a more inclusive channel.  We used app-reviews@mozilla.org for a while (still have it, technically).

> We already have a mozilla.webapps hierarchy; would mozilla.webapps.review
> make sense?

I thought that had been deprecated in favour of mozilla.dev.webapps - Caitlin proposed merging back in Jan 2014 but I guess that didn't happen (not sure exactly how groups get closed/merged/moved).  mozilla.dev.webapps.review felt too wordy, and kinda inaccurate.

Lisa, thoughts on mozilla.webapps.review (webapps-review@lists.mozilla.org)?
Flags: needinfo?(adora)
(In reply to Andrew Williamson [:eviljeff] from comment #2)
> In a way - its supposed to for developers to query the reviews they've
> received, and for us to more generally talk to the community about app
> review.  Its likely most of the participants will be still be reviewers, but
> we want to have a more inclusive channel.  We used app-reviews@mozilla.org
> for a while (still have it, technically).

OK, cool.

> > We already have a mozilla.webapps hierarchy; would mozilla.webapps.review
> > make sense?
> 
> I thought that had been deprecated in favour of mozilla.dev.webapps -

Yes, it seems that mozilla.webapps has gone silent. mozilla.webapps.pt-br still exists, but now I look, that's pretty dead too.

> Caitlin proposed merging back in Jan 2014 but I guess that didn't happen
> (not sure exactly how groups get closed/merged/moved). 

File a bug, like this one, although "merged" we can't really do. "Closed" is possible.

> mozilla.dev.webapps.review felt too wordy, and kinda inaccurate.
> 
> Lisa, thoughts on mozilla.webapps.review (webapps-review@lists.mozilla.org)?

If mozilla.webapps is dying, let's not reinvest there. I'd be happy with mozilla.app-review.

Gerv
(Reporter)

Comment 4

3 years ago
Can we go ahead with mozilla.appreview then?
Flags: needinfo?(adora)
Over to IT for implementation of mozilla.app-review.

Gerv
Assignee: gerv → nobody
Component: Discussion Forums → MOC: Service Requests
Product: mozilla.org → Infrastructure & Operations
QA Contact: justdave → lypulong
Summary: Discussion Forum: mozilla.appreview → Discussion Forum: mozilla.app-review
(Reporter)

Comment 6

3 years ago
(In reply to Gervase Markham [:gerv] from comment #5)
> Over to IT for implementation of mozilla.app-review.
> 
> Gerv

Is the '-' essential?  We'd prefer without.
Not essential, although I feel it adds clarity. Removing.

Gerv
Summary: Discussion Forum: mozilla.app-review → Discussion Forum: mozilla.appreview
Assignee: nobody → sespinoza
(Assignee)

Comment 8

3 years ago
Discussion form has been created and sent off to giganews. Please allow 24-48 hours for turnaround.
(Assignee)

Comment 9

3 years ago
this should be good to go.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
(Reporter)

Comment 10

3 years ago
Hi, I'm not seeing messages propagate to the newsgroup on nttp://news.mozilla.org (the google groups interface and the mailing list are working).  Is this everything working okay?
Flags: needinfo?(sespinoza)
(Assignee)

Comment 11

3 years ago
:eviljeff

I've emailed giganews, everything seems good on our side.
Flags: needinfo?(sespinoza)
(Assignee)

Comment 12

3 years ago
reply from  giganews. 

 "Hello Sal,

Thank you for your patience in this matter. Our Engineering team reports this issue is now fixed.

Please let us know if you need anything else. "



could you please confirm?
Flags: needinfo?(awilliamson)
(Reporter)

Comment 13

3 years ago
The messages that were previously missing have now appeared, but one sent earlier today - 9 hours ago - is yet to show up.  I don't know if that's normal, but I expected them to propagate to the Google groups interface and the newsgroup at similar paces.
Flags: needinfo?(awilliamson)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.