Closed
Bug 113601
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Different handling on Windows and Linux
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: gschmidl, Assigned: jst)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
The page at the above URL works as intended on the following browsers:
Netscape 4.7x on Windows; IE 5, 5.5 and 6.0 on Windows; IE 5 on MacOS and
Mozilla 0.9.6 on Windows (see http://fourcoffees.com/moz.gif for an image).
It does not, however, work correctly on Mozilla 0.9.6 for Linux (Mozilla/5.0
(X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011124), as can be seen at
http://fourcoffees.com/Xmoz.gif -- specifically, the Calendar, which uses DHTML,
is all over the place. Its source is at
http://195.3.98.252/lt_working_directory/working/navigation/calendar.js
There aren't any javascript errors, nor is "quirk mode" at fault, since adding a
transitional DOCTYPE doesn't change anything.
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
The connection was refused when attempting to contact 195.3.98.252.
Whoops, the IP has changed to 195.3.98.248 -- sorry about this.
Updated•24 years ago
|
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
Reporter, could you please give us a working testcase that does not return a
Server Error 500 please? There is no way for us to look at it if you block it.
![]() |
||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
Just tried the page in IE5.0/Solaris. The rendering looks identical to current
linux mozilla.
as far as I can see, the url mentioned does not work in moz (latest
nightly)/winie5/opera5 . One of the big problems is that your js files are
missing and the server is redirecting to a "page not found" page without sending
a 404.
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
I just tried the page with Mozilla/Linux(build id: 2002012023) and IE5.5/win98.
It doesnt work as intended. Calendar is overlapping with menu on left frame.
There is a slight difference between mozilla and ie, though.
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
Okay, this is obviously invalid then. It looks horrible on IE too according to
the 3 previous commenters (thank you guys for testing this).
In any case, a brief glance at the code shows me statically positioned elements
in absolutely positioned elements which while fine, does not account for their
size so of course things get squished. You should take care to always size your
absolute elements. It appears you have some javascript missing too.
How do you expect Mozilla to render this at all? Invalid.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•