Closed
Bug 1138566
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Camera API ApiRef Macro TemplateExecutionError
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: General, defect)
Developer Documentation Graveyard
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: brad, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
|
80.97 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
Build ID: 20150228155808
Steps to reproduce:
1. Go to https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/CameraCapabilities/flashModes
2. Preview changes (even without editing)
Actual results:
An error appears:
Error type: TemplateExecutionError
In macro: ApiRef (Edit Template)
Parsing macro: ApiRef([u'Camera API']) Full text of error:
Expected results:
No errors, as nothing changed.
(For background, wanted to suggest editing the "This API is available on Firefox OS for internal applications only." notice, because as of 2.0 this isn't the case anymore.)
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
The page has been regenerated. The error has gone.
cc/ Chris who is maintaining the Firefox OS docs.
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to brad from comment #0)
>
> (For background, wanted to suggest editing the "This API is available on
> Firefox OS for internal applications only." notice, because as of 2.0 this
> isn't the case anymore.)
Good spot Brad - the Camera API is now available to internal and priviledged. I've updated all the macros to say this.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Chris: what's the current process to catch these changes? Do the dev teams open a bug for such a change or is it done outside the bugzilla realm?
Flags: needinfo?(cmills)
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Usually I see announcements on lists like dev-webapi or dev-b2g, sometimes a bug is filed. In this particular case I saw the annoucement and did most of the work required to communicate this on MDN, but overlooked updating these banners. I guess the normal process should be to file a bug? Should we reiterate this to the engineers with a mail out?
Flags: needinfo?(cmills)
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
I have similar issues at the english and german version of the WindowTimers.setTimeout() page https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WindowTimers/setTimeout
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Egon Steiner from comment #5)
> I have similar issues at the english and german version of the
> WindowTimers.setTimeout() page
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WindowTimers/setTimeout
Still, they look ok now.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•