Closed
Bug 113924
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 23 years ago
Double FileNotFound property in appstrings.properties
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Navigation, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla0.9.8
People
(Reporter: m.wawoczny, Assigned: adamlock)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
798 bytes,
patch
|
ccarlen
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Double FileNotFound property in appstrings.properties, should be only one (?).
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/docshell/base/appstrings.properties#21
http://lxr.mozilla.org/mozilla/source/docshell/base/appstrings.properties#28
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; pl-PL; rv:0.9.6+) Gecko/20011206
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: Browser-General → Embedding: Docshell
Ever confirmed: true
Rick do you want to r / sr this?
I zapped the first version of fileNotFound because I found the wording more
terse. Please say if you would prefer to see the second one go instead.
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
fileNotFound=%s does not exist or could not be accessed
Can we actually fail because of a permission error? If not, it gives the user
two things to worry about when really all that matters is the file doesn't exist.
The message in question is displayed by nsWebShell when it receives an
NS_ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND error result. The network code typically returns this
error if nsILocalFile::Exists returns PR_FALSE. It is possible that incorrect
access rights or a non-existant file could trigger this result depending on the
nsLocalFile impl, so for correctness the error message should cover both cases.
Is the concept of access going to confuse Mac & Win32 users? I could understand
if it said permissions, but access seems fairly straightforward to understand.
If it might cause confusion it can be removed.
Thoughts?
*** Bug 119285 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
I think deleting the duplicate string would fine for now. If someone has a
problem with the wording, they can always raise a new bug on it. For the record,
webshell has no clue why the error was thrown so it seems sensible that it
suggests the two most likely reasons for the problem.
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 61584 [details] [diff] [review]
Removed first version
Removing the shorter string is fine with me. r=ccarlen
Attachment #61584 -
Flags: review+
Darin removed the first fileNotFound during a checkin for bug 47617
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 23 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•