11420 - Apprunner rld load error

Status: VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 10061

(SeaMonkey :: General, defect, P3)

Description

[chadp]

When attempting to load apprunner (using ./mozilla-apprunner.sh) get the
following errors

------Begin Errors------
282659:./apprunner: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in
/temp/package/libxpcom.so: Stub1__14nsXPTCStubBase
282659:./apprunner: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in
/temp/package/libxpcom.so: Stub2__14nsXPTCStubBase
282659:./apprunner: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in
/temp/package/libxpcom.so: Stub3__14nsXPTCStubBase
....Snipped for space....
282659:./apprunner: rld: Error: unresolvable symbol in
/temp/package/libxpcom.so: Stub124__14nsXPTCStubBase
282659:./apprunner: rld: Fatal Error: this executable has unresolvable symbols

My Hinv
====HINV====
stylin 34# hinv
CPU: MIPS R10000 Processor Chip Revision: 2.6
FPU: MIPS R10010 Floating Point Chip Revision: 0.0
1 175 MHZ IP32 Processor
Main memory size: 128 Mbytes
Secondary unified instruction/data cache size: 1 Mbyte on Processor 0
Instruction cache size: 32 Kbytes
Data cache size: 32 Kbytes
FLASH PROM version 4.8
Integral SCSI controller 0: Version ADAPTEC 7880
  Disk drive: unit 2 on SCSI controller 0
  CDROM: unit 4 on SCSI controller 0
Integral SCSI controller 1: Version ADAPTEC 7880
On-board serial ports: tty1
On-board serial ports: tty2
On-board EPP/ECP parallel port
CRM graphics installed
Integral Ethernet: ec0, version 1
Iris Audio Processor: version A3 revision 0
Video: MVP unit 0 version 1.4
 with no AV Card or Camera.
Vice: TRE
stylin 35#

Comment 1

[srinivas]

This bug should be filed against the Browser product; there is nothing related
to NSPR here.

Comment 2

[chris hofmann]

dp?

Comment 3

[Suresh Duddi (gone)]

This looks like the xptc stubs aren't written for sgi or being compiled in.
Mccabe?

Comment 4

[Mike McCabe]

The xptcall porting status page shows xptcall as ported and working, courtesy
[e-mail].

Did this code land?

Comment 5

[Mike McCabe]

John, can you resolve this one?

(Did you ever find an xptcall owner?)

Comment 6

[John Bandhauer]

shaver, how 'bout you? Recall that Jason no longer workds at SGI and cc'd us on
an email of a possible connection for new xptcall owner at SGI.

Comment 7

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

*** Bug 28801 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8

[Mike Shaver (:shaver -- probably not reading bugmail closely)]

I have no idea what to do here.  I'm tempted to invoke my ``if a platform
doesn't have one person who cares and knows enough to fix xptcall, I don't care
either'' rule, but that doesn't seem very charitable.

I'll post to .unix looking for SGI people, I guess.

Comment 9

[Mike Shaver (:shaver -- probably not reading bugmail closely)]

Amagamating my SGI-xptcall bugs.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 10061 ***

Comment 10

[Matt Perry]

Verified duplicate.