Closed
Bug 1147052
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 2 years ago
Tests under toolkit use gBrowser.contentDocument and/or gBrowser.contentWindow, which don't exist in e10s browsers
Categories
(Toolkit :: General, defect, P5)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
e10s | later | --- |
People
(Reporter: mconley, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Bug 1144149 will add contentDocumentAsCPOW and contentWindowAsCPOW shortcuts to gBrowser. When that happens, tests under toolkit should be updated to use that instead. Note that since these are tests, Mochitest will take advantage of the add-on shims, and will get gBrowser.contentWindow and gBrowser.contentDocument as expected. We should, however, migrate over eventually before we start dialing back the shims. Tests using gBrowser.contentDocument and/or gBrowser.contentWindow under toolkit/: toolkit/components/places/tests/browser/browser_bug680727.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_bug464222.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_bug699356.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_bug713810.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_contextmenu.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_gotoline.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_viewsourceprefs.js toolkit/components/viewsource/test/browser/browser_viewsourceprefs_nonhtml.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser.ini toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_autoscroll_disabled.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_bug295977_autoscroll_overflow.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_default_image_filename.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_input_file_tooltips.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_keyevents_during_autoscrolling.js toolkit/content/tests/browser/browser_save_resend_postdata.js toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug263683_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug304188_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug360437_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug409624_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug451286_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/bug451540_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/findbar_events_window.xul toolkit/content/tests/chrome/findbar_window.xul toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/browser/browser_bug562797.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_badargs.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_badargs2.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_bug638292.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_corrupt.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_enabled.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_enabled2.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_enabled3.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_localfile2.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_relative.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_trigger_redirect.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_unsigned_trigger.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/browser_whitelist.js toolkit/mozapps/extensions/test/xpinstall/head.js
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Isn't the long-term plan to drop contentWindowAsCPOW etc. too? I.e. shouldn't we be migrating these tests away from direct window access entirely rather than switching them from one deprecated API to another?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dave Townsend [:mossop] from comment #1) > Isn't the long-term plan to drop contentWindowAsCPOW etc. too? I.e. > shouldn't we be migrating these tests away from direct window access > entirely rather than switching them from one deprecated API to another? I guess it's a matter of understanding how difficult that'd be for these tests (which I haven't looked at closely, tbh). If we can switch them over to using messages, so much the better!
Updated•8 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P5
Comment 3•2 years ago
|
||
CPOWs have been removed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•