Closed Bug 1148068 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Indicate in tooltip that a run has been retriggered

Categories

(Tree Management :: Perfherder, defect, P3)

x86
macOS
defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: wlach, Assigned: sabergeass)

Details

(Keywords: ateam-summer-of-contribution)

Attachments

(1 file)

46 bytes, text/x-github-pull-request
wlach
: review+
Details | Review
If two datapoints are stacked on top of each other, it typically means that one is a retrigger of a talos run against the same revision. Let's point this out in the tooltip. Maybe also give it a retrigger number, for the case that there is more than one retrigger.
Hi Will, I'm interesting in this bug, could you assign it to me? Thank you :)
Go for it. The trick in this bug will be finding datapoints that are retriggers of each other (== have the same result set id) in the performance data, then updating the UI to reflect that.
Assignee: nobody → sabergeass
Attached file PR for bug 1148068
Maybe there are some indented problems, I just use 4 indented in here for now and waiting feedback on github from Will. Thank you :)
Attachment #8630845 - Flags: review?(wlachance)
I did a quick pass in the PR, maybe some comments were useful. Feel free Mike to refer to this nice style guide on indentation, it shows some varied examples for wrapping and indentation. But you can also look to styles in the treeherder repo itself, there's often ones there. http://google-styleguide.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/javascriptguide.xml > Code Formatting
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P3
Comment on attachment 8630845 [details] [review] PR for bug 1148068 Looks good, just one thing I'd like changed. r-'ing just as a reminder to make that change and ask for review again!
Attachment #8630845 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8630845 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8630845 [details] [review] PR for bug 1148068 So on closer inspection, this wasn't quite what I had in mind originally (originally I thought we would number each retrigger datapoint indicating its sequence -- i.e. retrigger 1, 3, 4...), however on further thought I think just providing the raw number of retriggers in the tooltip may be good enough. I think I'll push this for now. We can always push an update later.
Attachment #8630845 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review+
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: