Closed
Bug 115023
(cal-todo)
Opened 23 years ago
Closed 19 years ago
To Do [tasks] tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 16)
Categories
(Calendar :: General, defect)
Calendar
General
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: chris, Assigned: mostafah)
References
()
Details
(Keywords: meta)
Attachments
(1 file)
4.32 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
A while ago, on n.p.m.calendar, I wrote:
> A To Do list should also allow for differing priorities on each item in
> the list. The To Do List I was working on for a while (until I
> accidentally deleted it) had the usual Highest|High|Normal|Low|Lowest
> scale for items, and anything that helps me prioritize my messy life
> would be great. :D
>
> Mike Potter wrote:
>
>> _*To Do List*_
>>
>> A todo list should interact with the calendar, allowing you to jot
>> down things you have to do, and dates they should be completed by.
>
Now, I can come up with a quick and dirty to-do list on the left, probably can
come up with a dialog for adding and editing to-do items (if the event diag
isn't used), leaving only dealing with ical stuff.
I'm assigning to self, but for the time being there's bigger fish to fry, and
I'd like to have some comments before I actually begin working on such a list.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•23 years ago
|
||
Accepting.
I would like finer-grained control over the priorities. Such a scheme could coexist with the proposed scheme if each level had a corresponding "level": 100 -> Highest 75 -> High 50 -> Normal 25 -> Low 0 -> Lowest This permits intermediate priorities, which would be very convenient for me.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•23 years ago
|
||
I was using a scale of 1 to 5, going from Lowest to Highest, I didn't (nor do I now) see the need for priority levels in between those. My original To Do list had the following: Summary, Priority, Due Date, Notes. I didn't get much further than an an <outliner> on a XUL page and some JavaScript. Anyways, I have further comments on this: "jot down things" Lotus Organizer has it's notepad, and I have my JotPad applet (Win32 only) which should have an updated version by tonight (at http://www.meldstar.com/~ccharabaruk/crap/jotpad.zip). It's a bunch of pages, each with it's own title. Something like this in Calendar would also be appreciated, since I keep a lot of notes like that, and would rather not pollute my documents directory with them. Of course, there is still the ability to save the notes as text files, heh. Anyways, this belongs under another bug, and I've filed bug 115226 regarding this.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•23 years ago
|
||
My JotPad is elsewhere, see comments in bug 115226 about it. My concern is where to put To Do events. Obviously, we'll want to keep them in .oecalendar, but I'm uncertain whether or not we can fit it into the whole iCal thing that's going on. Comments?
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•23 years ago
|
||
[RFC2445] 4.6.2 To-do Component (Pgs. 54-5) is just right for this. It even has priority. The example from the iCalendar RFC is: BEGIN:VTODO UID:19970901T130000Z-123404@host.com DTSTAMP:19970901T1300Z DTSTART:19970415T133000Z DUE:19970416T045959Z SUMMARY:1996 Income Tax Preparation CLASS:CONFIDENTIAL CATEGORIES:FAMILY,FINANCE PRIORITY:1 STATUS:NEEDS-ACTION END:VTODO
Updated•23 years ago
|
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
Comment 6•23 years ago
|
||
Please take a look at Lotus Organizer's ToDo features. Lotus Organizer is the "Mother" (this means *best*) of all calendars/PIM's. :)
Comment 7•23 years ago
|
||
We're still trying to get a calendar out, let alone a to do list! :)
Reporter | ||
Comment 8•23 years ago
|
||
Mike: To Do shouldn't be hard at all... Considering that there's a VTODO type event (see comment #5), adding To Do functionality on the backend should be no problem. As for front-end, however, for now just list them with other VEVENTs.
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•23 years ago
|
||
Changed Summary field to match the other tracking bugs regarding the Calendar Requirements. Sorry for spam, and see bug 122643, I guess. :)
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Summary: To Do List (calendar requirements document) → To Do tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 15.0)
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•22 years ago
|
||
bug 135896: sidebar tab for to do events bug 135897: backend support for VTODO
Reporter | ||
Comment 11•22 years ago
|
||
Bugspam: Adding meta keyword to tracking bugs, something they should have had from the start. :P
Keywords: meta
Comment 12•22 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•22 years ago
|
||
bugspam: bug 145981 is the ui tracker.
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•22 years ago
|
||
Bugspam: saving my sanity by applying the "cal-todo" alias
Alias: cal-todo
Reporter | ||
Comment 15•22 years ago
|
||
Bugspam: Assigning this one to mikep, too.
Assignee: ccharabaruk → mikep
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Comment 16•22 years ago
|
||
bugspam: This is called "tasks" in the UI so adding "tasks" to summary
Summary: To Do tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 15.0) → To Do [tasks] tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 15.0)
Comment 17•22 years ago
|
||
Would it be possible to see the tasks in the calendar along with other events, so as to be able to plan the day.
Comment 18•21 years ago
|
||
New contact from mikep@oeone.com to mostafah@oeone.com Filter on string OttawaMBA to get rid of these messages. Sorry for the spam.
Assignee: mikep → mostafah
Updated•21 years ago
|
Hardware: PC → All
Summary: To Do [tasks] tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 15.0) → To Do [tasks] tracking bug (Calendar Requirements Document, section 16)
Comment 19•19 years ago
|
||
It should be possible to create sub-tasks to a given task.
Comment 20•19 years ago
|
||
My SW version: Sunbird v. 0.2 1. Performance issue: delay between commanding Edit task/Edit event and the dialog to come up is unreasonably long. 2. When I add task through "Week/Multiweek/Month view -> pop menu on the day XY -> New task...", it would be user friendly to prefill start date of the task to value XY. 3. Tasks are visible only in Multiweek view. Not in Month view. They aren't in week view as well, but it may be a bit tricky to come up with wise (= most effective for user) placement of tasks. Same about Day view. My idea: IMHO it may be OK to place them by start time or/and by due time.
Updated•19 years ago
|
QA Contact: colint → general
Comment 21•19 years ago
|
||
We don't need this tracking bug, because the underlying requirement document is outdated and has therefore been removed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 19 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•16 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•