Closed
Bug 1150896
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Default font is different between Nightly40 and Aurora39 and also bettween e10s and non-e10s
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Form Controls, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: alice0775, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(3 files)
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Steps Open select tag with new profile Actual results: Default font is different. Expected results: Should be same font.
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
It regressed in last day, so probably patch from bug #1123654 caused this.
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
The font change is expected, as discussed in bug 1123654. I don't know offhand why e10s vs non-e10s would give different results. From the screenshot, it looks like they're both using the same font (Tahoma, I think), but the e10s window is using a larger size for the opened <select> list. Was there any visible e10s vs non-e10s difference before bug 1123654?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jonathan Kew (:jfkthame) from comment #3) > The font change is expected, as discussed in bug 1123654. > Okay, so this is by design. > I don't know offhand why e10s vs non-e10s would give different results. From > the screenshot, it looks like they're both using the same font (Tahoma, I > think), but the e10s window is using a larger size for the opened <select> > list. > > Was there any visible e10s vs non-e10s difference before bug 1123654? Maybe this is Bug 910022.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
status-firefox39:
unaffected → ---
status-firefox40:
affected → ---
tracking-e10s:
? → ---
tracking-firefox40:
? → ---
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alice0775 White from comment #5) > > I don't know offhand why e10s vs non-e10s would give different results. From > > the screenshot, it looks like they're both using the same font (Tahoma, I > > think), but the e10s window is using a larger size for the opened <select> > > list. > > > > Was there any visible e10s vs non-e10s difference before bug 1123654? > > Maybe this is Bug 910022. Sounds like it. OK, thanks for checking.
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
This looks like a dupe of bug 1132561, which we already triaged.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•