Closed Bug 1153266 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Allow turning on unboxed objects with an environment variable

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla40
Tracking Status
firefox40 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: bhackett1024, Assigned: bhackett1024)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

Attached patch patchSplinter Review
For testing unboxed objects in the browser on AWFY it would be good to be able to turn on unboxed objects with an environment variable.
Attachment #8590877 - Flags: review?(hv1989)
Comment on attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: js/src/vm/UnboxedObject.cpp @@ +954,5 @@ > bool > js::TryConvertToUnboxedLayout(ExclusiveContext* cx, Shape* templateShape, > ObjectGroup* group, PreliminaryObjectArray* objects) > { > + if (!getenv("JS_OPTION_USE_UNBOXED_OBJECTS")) { Might it be best to cache this at startup, particularly as getenv is not required to be thread safe.
(In reply to Douglas Crosher [:dougc] from comment #1) > Might it be best to cache this at startup, particularly as getenv is not > required to be thread safe. Well, I should have said this earlier but this environment variable will be removed when unboxed objects are turned on by default. So this will really only be used for getting numbers from AWFY in the interim. AFAICT there are other places where we use getenv in the JS engine off thread.
Comment on attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: js/src/vm/UnboxedObject.cpp @@ +957,5 @@ > { > + if (!getenv("JS_OPTION_USE_UNBOXED_OBJECTS")) { > + if (!templateShape->runtimeFromAnyThread()->options().unboxedObjects()) > + return true; > + } Can we use JitOptions.cpp? There we have all these environment checks...
Attachment #8590877 - Flags: review?(hv1989)
JitOptions.cpp seems like it is for JIT options, and unboxed objects/arrays are not JIT things, so it seems weird to control them there. Maybe JitOptions.cpp should be moved somewhere else and repurposed for turning on/off minor features throughout the engine?
Comment on attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review] patch Review of attachment 8590877 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Good point ::: js/src/vm/UnboxedObject.cpp @@ +954,5 @@ > bool > js::TryConvertToUnboxedLayout(ExclusiveContext* cx, Shape* templateShape, > ObjectGroup* group, PreliminaryObjectArray* objects) > { > + if (!getenv("JS_OPTION_USE_UNBOXED_OBJECTS")) { Can you add a comment that this is temporary? Maybe also eagerly return when NIGHTLY_BUILD is not set?
Attachment #8590877 - Flags: review+
Assignee: nobody → bhackett1024
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla40
Enabled on Windows 8 and android firefox slave: http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=27 http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=27 If possible could you fix the kraken crashes? The AWFY slaves use a relative long timer to detect these cases, before going to the next benchmark.
(In reply to Hannes Verschore [:h4writer] from comment #8) > Enabled on Windows 8 and android firefox slave: > http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=27 > http://arewefastyet.com/#machine=27 > > If possible could you fix the kraken crashes? The AWFY slaves use a relative > long timer to detect these cases, before going to the next benchmark. Bug 1155033 should fix these crashes.
I noticed while reading code today that unboxed arrays are still Nightly-only. Should we let it ride the trains now?
Flags: needinfo?(bhackett1024)
(In reply to Shu-yu Guo [:shu] from comment #10) > I noticed while reading code today that unboxed arrays are still > Nightly-only. Should we let it ride the trains now? Unboxed arrays don't pass tests atm and have some perf issues we would have to fix first..
Yeah, it would be nice to turn on unboxed arrays but I kind of ran out of steam working on benchmark optimization, especially after bug 1162272.
Flags: needinfo?(bhackett1024)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: