Closed Bug 1154319 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Release notes for 4.2.14

Categories

(Bugzilla :: Bugzilla-General, defect)

defect
Not set
blocker

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
Bugzilla 4.2

People

(Reporter: dkl, Assigned: dkl)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

Release notes changes describing fixed/improvements since last release.
Flags: blocking4.4.9+
Target Milestone: --- → Bugzilla 4.2
Flags: blocking4.4.9+ → blocking4.2.14+
Attached patch 1154319_1.patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Assignee: general → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8592334 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 8592334 [details] [diff] [review]
1154319_1.patch

>+  <li>Fixing an issue where it is possible to tell if someone made a private
>+    comment on a [% terms.bug %] even if user is not an <i>insider</i>.

Same comments as for 4.0.18.


>+  <li>Fixing an issue where the test <kbd>t/003safesys.t</kbd> was not testing
>+    files properly due to a missing <kbd>-T</kbd> argument.

Remove it. Only relevant to Bugzilla developers. Instead, mention bug 1154099.


>+  <li>Fixing an issue where using <kbd>[% terms.Bug %].update</kbd> to change the

You must write B[%%]ug.update, else it could be converted into "Ticket.update" or "Issue.update" depending on the value set for terms.Bug. Also, do not start the sentence with "Fixing". Maybe:

  <kbd>B[%%]ug.update</kbd> was sometimes returning <kbd>cc_accessible</kbd> instead of <kbd>is_cc_accessible</kbd> as being changed.


>+    <kbd>cc_accessible</kbd> of a [% terms.bug %] would return an incorrect field

is_cc_accessible, not cc_accessible.


>+  <li>When using <kbd>CGI 4.05</kbd>, a large number of warnings would be logged
>+    by the webserver.

I would rather write:

  Suppress warnings thrown by CGI 4.05 and newer about "CGI::param called in list context".
Attachment #8592334 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review-
Attached patch 1154319_2.patchSplinter Review
Attachment #8592334 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8592545 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 8592545 [details] [diff] [review]
1154319_2.patch

r=LpSolit
Attachment #8592545 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
Flags: approval4.2?
Flags: approval4.2? → approval4.2+
To ssh://gitolite3@git.mozilla.org/bugzilla/bugzilla.git
   c955a24..d7f80ad  4.2 -> 4.2
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: