Release notes changes describing fixed/improvements since last release.
Created attachment 8592334 [details] [diff] [review] 1154319_1.patch
Assignee: general → dkl
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8592334 - Flags: review?(LpSolit)
Comment on attachment 8592334 [details] [diff] [review] 1154319_1.patch >+ <li>Fixing an issue where it is possible to tell if someone made a private >+ comment on a [% terms.bug %] even if user is not an <i>insider</i>. Same comments as for 4.0.18. >+ <li>Fixing an issue where the test <kbd>t/003safesys.t</kbd> was not testing >+ files properly due to a missing <kbd>-T</kbd> argument. Remove it. Only relevant to Bugzilla developers. Instead, mention bug 1154099. >+ <li>Fixing an issue where using <kbd>[% terms.Bug %].update</kbd> to change the You must write B[%%]ug.update, else it could be converted into "Ticket.update" or "Issue.update" depending on the value set for terms.Bug. Also, do not start the sentence with "Fixing". Maybe: <kbd>B[%%]ug.update</kbd> was sometimes returning <kbd>cc_accessible</kbd> instead of <kbd>is_cc_accessible</kbd> as being changed. >+ <kbd>cc_accessible</kbd> of a [% terms.bug %] would return an incorrect field is_cc_accessible, not cc_accessible. >+ <li>When using <kbd>CGI 4.05</kbd>, a large number of warnings would be logged >+ by the webserver. I would rather write: Suppress warnings thrown by CGI 4.05 and newer about "CGI::param called in list context".
Attachment #8592334 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review-
Created attachment 8592545 [details] [diff] [review] 1154319_2.patch
Comment on attachment 8592545 [details] [diff] [review] 1154319_2.patch r=LpSolit
Attachment #8592545 - Flags: review?(LpSolit) → review+
To ssh://email@example.com/bugzilla/bugzilla.git c955a24..d7f80ad 4.2 -> 4.2
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.