Closed Bug 1155937 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Figure out whether the comments about Baseline ICs in IonBuilder::getPropTryInnerize still make sense

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript Engine: JIT, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla45
Tracking Status
firefox45 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: bzbarsky, Assigned: jandem)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

I'm not sure they do.  We might still not have type info, but not because baseline ICs don't know about innerization.
Flags: needinfo?(jdemooij)
Attached patch PatchSplinter Review
Hm I think you're right, this patch removes the comment.

I also moved the other comment to the top of getPropTryInnerize, somebody moved it inside the `if` and it became a bit confusing.
Assignee: nobody → jdemooij
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(jdemooij)
Attachment #8634029 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky)
Comment on attachment 8634029 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch

r=me
Attachment #8634029 - Flags: review?(bzbarsky) → review+
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d2f4c8ad4ed5
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla45
removing the b2g 2.5 flag since this commit has been reverted due to an incorrect merge, sorry for the confusion
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: