[meta] Launch Bugzilla Lite v2

RESOLVED FIXED in 2.2 S14 (12june)

Status

Firefox OS
Gaia::Bugzilla Lite
RESOLVED FIXED
3 years ago
3 years ago

People

(Reporter: daleharvey, Assigned: daleharvey)

Tracking

unspecified
2.2 S14 (12june)
x86
Mac OS X

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Whiteboard: [systemsfe])

Attachments

(7 attachments)

Comment hidden (empty)
(Assignee)

Updated

3 years ago
Assignee: nobody → dale
(Assignee)

Comment 1

3 years ago
Created attachment 8596400 [details]
profile page
(Assignee)

Comment 2

3 years ago
Created attachment 8596404 [details]
search page
(Assignee)

Comment 3

3 years ago
Created attachment 8596405 [details]
bug page
(Assignee)

Comment 4

3 years ago
Created attachment 8596407 [details]
dashboard page
(Assignee)

Comment 5

3 years ago
Created attachment 8596408 [details]
create page
(Assignee)

Comment 6

3 years ago
Hey

So I have branched v1 and master and fixed up what was in master, you can demo it @ http://bzlite.herokuapp.com/

I would love to get this in a place where we were happy deprecating v1 and using this instead, it adds some basic functionality, a dashboard for viewing assigned / flagged / filed bugs, a basic search and the ability to view bugs. 

The UX is very bare, no features / functionality is fixed and we can change up the layout and features etc. I would like to avoid adding too many features at this point, if we could get to the point where mostly the functionality as is is releasable asap then it will be easier to iterate and add features.

I think its a good idea for me to help out getting the rest of lightsaber getting released, but if we could get this done before release time and skip v1 all together that would be great :)

What do yall think?
Flags: needinfo?(jsavory)
Flags: needinfo?(jgong)
Flags: needinfo?(epang)
switching ni to Amy since she's back from PTO
Flags: needinfo?(epang)
refer to comment 6
Flags: needinfo?(amlee)
It might be a good idea to hold a meeting in regards to what needs to be in the UX spec with some of the stake holders?

QA would be one of the stake holders as we need to manage the bugs and are usually the front line for user bugs (unconfirmed).

Release Management would probably need some tags as well.

UX and dev would also need to be in the meeting.  Do we have a PM or EPM for this?  or are we just managing the product ourselves from UX/Eng side?
(Assignee)

Comment 10

3 years ago
I believe most people are currently committed to working on spark until its launch. However if anyone wants to have a meeting about v2 I would happy to.

My current plan is to finish what I would be happy with a v2 being, will be asking for input along the way, hopefully by the time its 'finished' others from ux / product will have had time to have some input.
(Assignee)

Comment 11

3 years ago
So I am at a point now where I am fairly happy with the state of v2, probably a bunch of things I am missing but it seems in a usable state.

I would love to get any input on what could be considered a blocker for replacing v1 with this and I can work on a single branch, there hasnt been any UX done however I have tried to follow the fxos style guide as much as possible. I think there are a few raw places and happy to change up as much as needed.

You can test it out @ http://www.bzlite.com/ (and install @ http://www.bzlite.com/install.html)

Comment 12

3 years ago
Let talk about this at our BzLite v1 wrap up meeting tomorrow. I may have to setup a separate mtg for v2 Bzlite.
Flags: needinfo?(jgong)
Created attachment 8614985 [details]
BugzillaLite_IxD.pdf

I've attached the IxD spec for Bugzilla Lite v2. I think I covered everything we discussed in the meeting but let me know if there is anything missing.
Flags: needinfo?(jsavory)
(In reply to Dale Harvey (:daleharvey) from comment #6)
> Hey
> 
> So I have branched v1 and master and fixed up what was in master, you can
> demo it @ http://bzlite.herokuapp.com/
> 
> I would love to get this in a place where we were happy deprecating v1 and
> using this instead, it adds some basic functionality, a dashboard for
> viewing assigned / flagged / filed bugs, a basic search and the ability to
> view bugs. 
> 
> The UX is very bare, no features / functionality is fixed and we can change
> up the layout and features etc. I would like to avoid adding too many
> features at this point, if we could get to the point where mostly the
> functionality as is is releasable asap then it will be easier to iterate and
> add features.
> 
> I think its a good idea for me to help out getting the rest of lightsaber
> getting released, but if we could get this done before release time and skip
> v1 all together that would be great :)
> 
> What do yall think?

Removing NI. Already discussed this offline and will aim to include these features.
Flags: needinfo?(amlee)
(Assignee)

Comment 15

3 years ago
Created attachment 8616992 [details] [review]
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/bzlite/pull/15

Hey Doug, Mostly a visual update to the existing implementation I had for a much more featureful bzlite. Cheers
Attachment #8616992 - Flags: review?(drs)
Comment on attachment 8616992 [details] [review]
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/bzlite/pull/15

I'm a little rusty as I haven't seen many of the changes in BzLite v2, but I did what I could. I left some comments on the PR.
Attachment #8616992 - Flags: review?(drs) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 17

3 years ago
Thanks, yeh the 'v2' was the original bugzilla client I implemented, we hid everything but the create bug screen for v1 just to ensure it was finished in time but managed to get this specced up before launching, now that master is the main branch stuff hitting it will go through normal review

https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/bzlite/commit/e98ced8f02f18589b8121075158034b690635e7e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Whiteboard: [systemsfe]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.2 S14 (12june)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.