Closed
Bug 1159255
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Build error: MSVC_ENABLE_PGO = True is not permitted to be used in mailnews/intl/moz.build
Categories
(MailNews Core :: Build Config, defect)
MailNews Core
Build Config
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Thunderbird 40.0
People
(Reporter: ewong, Assigned: ewong)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
738 bytes,
patch
|
aleth
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Currently mailnews is busted: Reticulating splines... Traceback (most recent call last): File "./config.status", line 1014, in <module> config_status(**args) File "/builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/config_status.py", line 149, in config_status summary = the_backend.consume(definitions) File "/builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/backend/base.py", line 180, in consume for obj in objs: File "/builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/frontend/emitter.py", line 141, in emit for out in output: File "/builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/frontend/reader.py", line 975, in read_mozbuild raise bre mozbuild.frontend.reader.BuildReaderError: ============================== ERROR PROCESSING MOZBUILD FILE ============================== The error occurred while processing the following file: /builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build/mailnews/intl/moz.build The error was triggered on line 33 of this file: MSVC_ENABLE_PGO = True The underlying problem is an attempt to write a reserved UPPERCASE variable that does not exist. The variable write causing the error is: MSVC_ENABLE_PGO Please change the file to not use this variable. For reference, the set of valid variables is: A11Y_MANIFESTS, ANDROID_ECLIPSE_PROJECT_TARGETS, ANDROID_GENERATED_RESFILES, ANDROID_INSTRUMENTATION_MANIFESTS, ANDROID_RES_DIRS, BROWSER_CHROME_MANIFESTS, CFLAGS, CMFLAGS, CMMFLAGS, CONFIGURE_DEFINE_FILES, CONFIGURE_SUBST_FILES, CPP_UNIT_TESTS, CRASHTEST_MANIFESTS, CXXFLAGS, DEFFILE, DEFINES, DELAYLOAD_DLLS, DIRS, DISABLE_STL_WRAPPING, DIST_FILES, DIST_SUBDIR, EXPORTS, EXTRA_COMPONENTS, EXTRA_DSO_LDOPTS, EXTRA_JS_MODULES, EXTRA_PP_COMPONENTS, EXTRA_PP_JS_MODULES, FAIL_ON_WARNINGS, FILES_PER_UNIFIED_FILE, FINAL_LIBRARY, FINAL_TARGET, FINAL_TARGET_FILES, FORCE_SHARED_LIB, FORCE_STATIC_LIB, GENERATED_EVENTS_WEBIDL_FILES, GENERATED_FILES, GENERATED_INCLUDES, GENERATED_SOURCES, GENERATED_UNIFIED_SOURCES, GENERATED_WEBIDL_FILES, GYP_DIRS, HAS_MISC_RULE, HOST_LIBRARY_NAME, HOST_OS_LIBS, HOST_PROGRAM, HOST_SIMPLE_PROGRAMS, HOST_SOURCES, HOST_USE_LIBS, IPDL_SOURCES, IS_COMPONENT, IS_FRAMEWORK, JAR_MANIFESTS, JAVA_JAR_TARGETS, JETPACK_ADDON_MANIFESTS, JETPACK_PACKAGE_MANIFESTS, JS_PREFERENCE_FILES, LDFLAGS, LD_VERSION_SCRIPT, LIBRARY_DEFINES, LIBRARY_NAME, LOCAL_INCLUDES, METRO_CHROME_MANIFESTS, MOCHITEST_CHROME_MANIFESTS, MOCHITEST_MANIFESTS, MOCHITEST_WEBAPPRT_CHROME_MANIFESTS, MOCHITEST_WEBAPPRT_CONTENT_MANIFESTS, NO_DIST_INSTALL, NO_JS_MANIFEST, NO_PGO, NO_VISIBILITY_FLAGS, OS_LIBS, PREPROCESSED_TEST_WEBIDL_FILES, PREPROCESSED_WEBIDL_FILES, PROGRAM, PYTHON_UNIT_TESTS, RCFILE, RCINCLUDE, REFTEST_MANIFESTS, RESFILE, RESOURCE_FILES, SDK_LIBRARY, SHARED_LIBRARY_NAME, SIMPLE_PROGRAMS, SONAME, SOURCES, SPHINX_PYTHON_PACKAGE_DIRS, SPHINX_TREES, STATIC_LIBRARY_NAME, TESTING_JS_MODULES, TEST_DIRS, TEST_HARNESS_FILES, TEST_WEBIDL_FILES, UNIFIED_SOURCES, USE_EXTENSION_MANIFEST, USE_LIBS, USE_STATIC_LIBS, WEBIDL_EXAMPLE_INTERFACES, WEBIDL_FILES, WEBRTC_SIGNALLING_TEST_MANIFESTS, WIN32_EXE_LDFLAGS, XPCSHELL_TESTS_MANIFESTS, XPIDL_MODULE, XPIDL_SOURCES, XPI_NAME *** Fix above errors and then restart with\ "make -f client.mk build" make[1]: *** [configure] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/builds/slave/c-cen-t-lnx/build' I suspect TB is also busted.
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ewong
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8598650 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18)
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the bustage! That patch looks good to me.
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8598650 [details] [diff] [review] proposed patch (v1) Review of attachment 8598650 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Stealing this review in the interest of unbusting the tree...
Attachment #8598650 -
Flags: review?(Pidgeot18) → review+
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Thunderbird 40.0
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment hidden (Legacy TBPL/Treeherder Robot) |
Comment 29•9 years ago
|
||
This patch seems to be missing from current comm-release (https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-release/file/default/mailnews/intl/moz.build), hence builds fail here with the same error (tested on Linux and Windows). https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/comm-release: 3b2a878de79bef8002ec52776362394d9d6f6e8b https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-release: 9879336c72be993ea9e57af2d91c92c90cc95806 07:43:00 Traceback (most recent call last): 07:43:00 File "./config.status", line 1021, in <module> 07:43:00 config_status(**args) 07:43:00 File "/home/mozilla/jenkins/workspace/seamonkey-release_linux64/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/config_status.py", line 149, in config_status 07:43:00 summary = the_backend.consume(definitions) 07:43:00 File "/home/mozilla/jenkins/workspace/seamonkey-release_linux64/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/backend/base.py", line 180, in consume 07:43:00 for obj in objs: 07:43:00 File "/home/mozilla/jenkins/workspace/seamonkey-release_linux64/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/frontend/emitter.py", line 142, in emit 07:43:00 for out in output: 07:43:00 File "/home/mozilla/jenkins/workspace/seamonkey-release_linux64/mozilla/python/mozbuild/mozbuild/frontend/reader.py", line 977, in read_mozbuild 07:43:00 raise bre 07:43:00 mozbuild.frontend.reader.BuildReaderError: 07:43:00 ============================== 07:43:00 ERROR PROCESSING MOZBUILD FILE 07:43:00 ============================== 07:43:00 07:43:00 The error occurred while processing the following file: 07:43:00 07:43:00 /home/mozilla/jenkins/workspace/seamonkey-release_linux64/mailnews/intl/moz.build 07:43:00 07:43:00 The error was triggered on line 33 of this file: 07:43:00 07:43:00 MSVC_ENABLE_PGO = True 07:43:00 07:43:00 The underlying problem is an attempt to write a reserved UPPERCASE variable that does not exist. 07:43:00 07:43:00 The variable write causing the error is: 07:43:00 07:43:00 MSVC_ENABLE_PGO 07:43:00 07:43:00 Please change the file to not use this variable.
Severity: normal → blocker
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Comment 30•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8598650 [details] [diff] [review] proposed patch (v1) [Approval Request Comment] see comment 29. Is SM releasing 39 or why did this come up?
Attachment #8598650 -
Flags: approval-comm-release?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 31•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to aleth [:aleth] from comment #30) > Is SM releasing 39 or why did this come up? Nope - this did come up while I tried to do my own builds out of comm-release.
Comment 32•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Adrian Kalla [:adriank] from comment #31) > (In reply to aleth [:aleth] from comment #30) > > Is SM releasing 39 or why did this come up? > > Nope - this did come up while I tried to do my own builds out of > comm-release. You probably know this already, but just in case I should point out that building off c-r won't give you a TB version that was ever released, as TB releases are based off the ESR branches (31, 38, 45...).
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to aleth [:aleth] from comment #32) > (In reply to Adrian Kalla [:adriank] from comment #31) > > (In reply to aleth [:aleth] from comment #30) > > > Is SM releasing 39 or why did this come up? > > > > Nope - this did come up while I tried to do my own builds out of > > comm-release. > > You probably know this already, but just in case I should point out that > building off c-r won't give you a TB version that was ever released, as TB > releases are based off the ESR branches (31, 38, 45...). Yes, this needs to be pushed to c-r to fix SeaMonkey release.
Comment 34•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Edmund Wong (:ewong) from comment #33) > Yes, this needs to be pushed to c-r to fix SeaMonkey release. Never mind: Looks like I was building after the mozilla-beta to mozilla-release merge, but before the comm-beta to comm-release merge - now the problem does not happen anymore.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8598650 -
Flags: approval-comm-release?
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•