Closed Bug 1161326 Opened 9 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Add intermittent bugs to ActiveData

Categories

(Testing Graveyard :: ActiveData, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED WORKSFORME

People

(Reporter: ekyle, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

Joel's list of intermittents:

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QeZuZ4hX-LUTXhB93ogWFZO_idX7gNnyO0RF_Z6PZss/edit#gid=47775445

Link to example intermittent: 

    https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1137412

Some code that tries to match the star to the bug number: 

    https://github.com/mozilla/treeherder/blob/4824072e39c78fd96ea4d668f536f2927d7473e0/treeherder/log_parser/utils.py#L123

Link to ModevMetrics query tool:

    http://people.mozilla.org/~klahnakoski/modevmetrics/Util-QueryTool.html

Bugzilla ES query for all intermittents:
> {
>     "from":"public_bugs",
>     "select":["bug_id","short_desc"],
>     "esfilter":{"and":[
>         {"term":{"keyword":"intermittent-failure"}},
>         {"range":{"expires_on":{"gt":1430781113000}}}
>     ]}
> }
Summary: Add intermittent bugs to datastore → Add intermittent bugs to ActiveData
Marking up AD test results with BZ `intermittent-failures` will require a daemon to do so.  Alternately, it could be done by the intermittent summarization tool at request time (after all, it has access to the BZ ES cluster to do this).

Which is better?
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
either is better- probably the daemon approach will be faster, but I see no harm in doing it in the summarization end.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Assignee: klahnakoski → nobody
I forget the exact purpose of this bug.  We have NeglectedOranges; which seems to satisfy most of the need here.  Re-open this bug if I am wrong.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Product: Testing → Testing Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.