Closed
Bug 11644
Opened 25 years ago
Closed 17 years ago
Cache options based on file type
Categories
(Core :: Networking: Cache, enhancement)
Core
Networking: Cache
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: luch, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: verifyme)
There should a cache option that allows to choose what type of file should be kept in cache. You could put a couple of checkboxes: || HTML files || Images || Other files This could be helpful for small intranet networks that don't want to keep personnal info on disk (HTML Files) but that want to keep images to speed up loading. Thanx for at least reading and maybe apply! :)
Good idea. Should be doable relatively easily in 5.0. But cache is not in yet. Marking for later and assigning to scott- our Cache Man! :) Thanks for the suggestion.
Comment 2•25 years ago
|
||
This could become a part of bug #7380, which would be a bit more flexible than this.
Bulk move of all Cache (to be deleted component) bugs to new Networking: Cache component.
Comment 5•22 years ago
|
||
LATER is deprecated.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: LATER → ---
Summary: Cache options → Cache options based on file type
Comment 6•22 years ago
|
||
I think I'm missing the point of this bug.. If you don't want certain content to be cached then you can provide the browser with the appropriate HTTP headers. IMO not caching sensitive files is something that the server should manage, not the client..
Comment 7•20 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 265092 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
->defaults
Assignee: gagan → darin
Status: REOPENED → NEW
QA Contact: tever → core.networking.cache
Updated•18 years ago
|
Priority: P3 → --
Comment 10•18 years ago
|
||
+1 to Bart's comment... the server has a much better idea about what is cacheable than the user does. If this is about giving hints to the algorithm that is used when there isn't explicit freshness info (i.e., heuristic freshness), that's OK, but if it's about overriding the server's freshness info, it's going to cause a lot of trouble.
Comment 11•17 years ago
|
||
RESOLVED/invalid. Now that I've (finally) had time to read this entire bug, I'm going to mark it invalid, per my hypothetical powers as the default cacheQA person. The reason: For the use case provided, this is something that should be implemented via the server. Doing this via a client is not a good idea, even if you have enterprise-level browser config features, like MCD. There might be other, sensible use cases that would fall under the description of this bug, but for now, this bug is closed.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 25 years ago → 17 years ago
Keywords: verifyme
QA Contact: networking.cache → benc
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•