Closed
Bug 1164976
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
fire caret move and state change events for proxies[
Categories
(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)
Core
Disability Access APIs
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla41
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox41 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: tbsaunde, Assigned: tbsaunde)
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
|
3.64 KB,
patch
|
davidb
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
2.78 KB,
patch
|
davidb
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
8.06 KB,
patch
|
davidb
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
No description provided.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8605942 -
Flags: review?(dbolter)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8605945 -
Flags: review?(dbolter)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8605946 -
Flags: review?(dbolter)
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8605942 [details] [diff] [review]
move AccessibleWrap::FireStateChangeEvent to be a member of MaiAtkObject
Review of attachment 8605942 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
ok r=me. We have a comment somewhere that "MaiAtkObject is a thin wrapper"; at some point we might want to edit that.
::: accessible/atk/AccessibleWrap.cpp
@@ +1128,5 @@
>
> switch (type) {
> case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_STATE_CHANGE:
> + {
> + AccStateChangeEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
We used to NS_ENSURE_TRUE here which was our pattern when using QueryInterface to downcast... should we keep it?
@@ +1130,5 @@
> case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_STATE_CHANGE:
> + {
> + AccStateChangeEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
> + MAI_ATK_OBJECT(atkObj)-> FireStateChangeEvent(event->GetState(),
> + event->IsStateEnabled());
nit: unnecessary space after the initial dereference '->'
Attachment #8605942 -
Flags: review?(dbolter) → review+
Updated•11 years ago
|
Attachment #8605945 -
Flags: review?(dbolter) → review+
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8605946 [details] [diff] [review]
fire useful state change and caret move events for proxies
Review of attachment 8605946 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
r=me with nit and question.
::: accessible/base/EventQueue.cpp
@@ +503,5 @@
> ipcDoc->SendEvent(id, aEvent->GetEventType());
> break;
> + case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_STATE_CHANGE: {
> + AccStateChangeEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
> + ipcDoc->SendStateChangeEvent(id, event->GetState(),
Do we need to ensure event or is the downcast guaranteed?
@@ +510,5 @@
> + }
> + case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_TEXT_CARET_MOVED: {
> + AccCaretMoveEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
> + ipcDoc->SendEvent(id, event->GetCaretOffset());
> + break;
The indenting here went haywire.
Attachment #8605946 -
Flags: review?(dbolter) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Bolter [:davidb] from comment #4)
> Comment on attachment 8605942 [details] [diff] [review]
> move AccessibleWrap::FireStateChangeEvent to be a member of MaiAtkObject
>
> Review of attachment 8605942 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ok r=me. We have a comment somewhere that "MaiAtkObject is a thin wrapper";
> at some point we might want to edit that.
>
> ::: accessible/atk/AccessibleWrap.cpp
> @@ +1128,5 @@
> >
> > switch (type) {
> > case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_STATE_CHANGE:
> > + {
> > + AccStateChangeEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
>
> We used to NS_ENSURE_TRUE here which was our pattern when using
> QueryInterface to downcast... should we keep it?
It should never fail and if does I think its a bug so crashing seems better than pretending its ok.
> @@ +503,5 @@
> > ipcDoc->SendEvent(id, aEvent->GetEventType());
> > break;
> > + case nsIAccessibleEvent::EVENT_STATE_CHANGE: {
> > + AccStateChangeEvent* event = downcast_accEvent(aEvent);
> > + ipcDoc->SendStateChangeEvent(id, event->GetState(),
>
> Do we need to ensure event or is the downcast guaranteed?
same
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/d9afa8ff148e
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/661f089f73b5
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e5649b9714d1
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
status-firefox41:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla41
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → tbsaunde+mozbugs
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•