Closed Bug 11729 Opened 25 years ago Closed 21 years ago

security for event capture

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect, P3)

All
Windows NT
defect

Tracking

()

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 180762
Future

People

(Reporter: norrisboyd, Assigned: security-bugs)

Details

(Keywords: dom0)

Subject:
             Re: event capture
        Date:
             Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:46:07 -0700
       From:
             joki@netscape.com (Tom Pixley)
 Organization:
             Netscape Communications
         To:
             Norris Boyd <norris@netscape.com>

No, the event model is in fact nearly the same.  We still need to worry
about handling of events outside their domain.  The problem is lessened
somewhat in that we don't pass events all the way up through framesets.
If you get a chance you can check out the Event Model section of the DOM
Level 2 draft linked off of http://w3c.org/dom

        -tom

Norris Boyd wrote:
>
> In 5.x, do we still need to worry about event capture and security, or
> is the event model sufficiently different that it's not a concern?
>
> --Norris
Blocks: 7254
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M13
Whiteboard: Help wanted: joki could help here
No longer blocks: 7254
Summary: security for event capture → [Feature] security for event capture
Target Milestone: M13 → M14
Whiteboard: Help wanted: joki could help here
Target Milestone: M14 → M15
Push security review tasks off until M16.
Target Milestone: M15 → M16
Summary: [Feature] security for event capture → security for event capture
Target Milestone: M16 → M17
Bulk reassigning most of norris's bugs to mstoltz.
Assignee: norris → mstoltz
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
This is related to some open exploits involving event capture...need to take a 
more general look at this mechanism to make sure we're handling security the 
right way.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
This bug is a placeholder for me. joki is checking in a patch which prevents
cross-domain event capture using event handlers. There may still be
vulnerabilities involving bubbling.
Group: netscapeconfidential?
Target Milestone: M17 → Future
Future.
Group: netscapeconfidential?
Keywords: dom0

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 180762 ***
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 21 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.