Closed
Bug 1173749
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
URLs in the URL bar's autocomplete popup should use a lighter blue
Categories
(Firefox :: Theme, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 41
People
(Reporter: dao, Assigned: dao)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
948 bytes,
patch
|
Gijs
:
review+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I believe we're using -moz-nativehyperlinktext at the moment. http://people.mozilla.org/~shorlander/mockups/Windows-10/Windows-10.html wants something lighter.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → dao
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8621542 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Review of attachment 8621542 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I'm a little confused over the media query here; the only non-default themes right now are high-contrast ones, is there a reason not to do the same there?
Likewise, is there a particular reason not to apply the same styling on win8?
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #2)
> I'm a little confused over the media query here; the only non-default themes
> right now are high-contrast ones, is there a reason not to do the same there?
Highlight is not a proper text color, it's a background color that's supposed to be used in conjunction with HighlightText, so there's no guarantee this will be legible with different high contrast themes.
> Likewise, is there a particular reason not to apply the same styling on win8?
dunno
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dão Gottwald [:dao] from comment #3)
> (In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #2)
> > I'm a little confused over the media query here; the only non-default themes
> > right now are high-contrast ones, is there a reason not to do the same there?
>
> Highlight is not a proper text color, it's a background color that's
> supposed to be used in conjunction with HighlightText, so there's no
> guarantee this will be legible with different high contrast themes.
OK. Should we hardcode this to an rgb value instead of relying on this constant, in case win10 adds more default themes where this doesn't work?
> > Likewise, is there a particular reason not to apply the same styling on win8?
>
> dunno
Mmk, let's leave that for now then.
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to :Gijs Kruitbosch from comment #4)
> > Highlight is not a proper text color, it's a background color that's
> > supposed to be used in conjunction with HighlightText, so there's no
> > guarantee this will be legible with different high contrast themes.
>
> OK. Should we hardcode this to an rgb value instead of relying on this
> constant, in case win10 adds more default themes where this doesn't work?
If Windows 10 adds another theme we don't know about yet, the rgb value could similarly be illegible, so we probably shouldn't consider that a default theme in the first place.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 41
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8621542 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: windows 10
[User impact if declined]: just subtle aesthetics
[Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: none
[Risks and why]: trivial CSS patch, not risky
[String/UUID change made/needed]: none
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify+
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed on Nightly 41.0a1 (2015-06-15), using Windows 10 Pro Insider Preview (build 10130).
The mock available in Comment 0 shows #0096FF as a highlight color, while current Nightly shows #3399FF, which is really close as far as the eye can tell. I assume that the fact that they're not exactly the same is intended - Dão, please correct me if I'm wrong.
Spot-checked high-contrast themes as well, to make sure that no regressions were introduced by this change.
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Andrei Vaida, QA [:avaida] from comment #9)
> The mock available in Comment 0 shows #0096FF as a highlight color, while
> current Nightly shows #3399FF, which is really close as far as the eye can
> tell. I assume that the fact that they're not exactly the same is intended -
Yes. The mockup uses the same color for the URLs as for the selected entry's background. We do the same here. The color being slightly different from the native Highlight color would be a mistake in the mockup.
Flags: needinfo?(dao)
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8621542 [details] [diff] [review]
patch
Verified + windows 10, taking it for 40.
Attachment #8621542 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
status-firefox40:
--- → fixed
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
Verified fixed on Beta 40.0b2 (20150706172413) as well, using Windows 10 Pro x64 (Build 10158).
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•