Closed Bug 1181573 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

when comparing two revisions on compare view, it would be nicer to have a description of the push without clicking on a link

Categories

(Tree Management :: Perfherder, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: jmaher, Assigned: sabergeass)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

the selection of revisions in compare chooser has been getting better, but human error is the last remaining cause of pain. Assume you have a bunch of pushes in trying to narrow down a regression when we don't have an alert to give us a starting point. Now we want to find the one that is causing problems and send a compare view link in the bug. The problem is with many revisions, it is easy to put the wrong revision in the old/new or just get the wrong revision. Ideas to help out would be: * show a pushlog view of changes in the compare view so we know which old and new are based on comments, etc. * in the revision selection, have a way to show a pushlog or some type of query that has matching data (i.e. all try pushes with pusher=jmaher@mozilla.com)
To start with, what do you think of just printing a short summary of the revision? This should be easier to format now that the base/new is formatted as a list. Maybe something like the attached screenshot?
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
:MikeLing might be interested in this once we figure out what to do. :)
I think this is great and much better than before!
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
(In reply to William Lachance (:wlach) from comment #2) > :MikeLing might be interested in this once we figure out what to do. :) yep, I'm happy to work on this ;)
Assignee: nobody → sabergeass
Attached file PR for bug 1181573
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 Looks good, see PR for some minor requests for revisions and changes.
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 Looks good, but same changes need to made in another place (sorry I missed that before). See PR for details.
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 I'd like to see the directive expanded so that we can remove more duplicated HTML from both templates. Looks good otherwise!
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 Seems like the subtest compare view is not working this time. Also a few other minor details I'd like to get cleaned up. :)
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 There seems to be a bug preventing the compare view from displaying properly with the latest PR applied. Also made some minor change requests. We're getting close though!
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review?(wlachance)
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 Missed some modifications requested last time + a request for one last small padding tweak.
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review?(wlachance) → review-
Comment on attachment 8637091 [details] [review] PR for bug 1181573 Fixes in PR moved this to an r+. \o/
Attachment #8637091 - Flags: review- → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Depends on: 1191632
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: