Closed
Bug 1186787
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Replace nsBaseHashtable::EnumerateRead() calls in chrome/ with iterators
Categories
(Core :: General, defect)
Core
General
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla45
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox45 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: n.nethercote, Assigned: n.nethercote)
References
Details
Attachments
(2 files)
|
4.21 KB,
patch
|
froydnj
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
2.42 KB,
patch
|
froydnj
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Because iterators are so much nicer than enumerate functions.
There are two occurrences of EnumerateRead() in this directory.
A note to the assignee: to preserve existing behaviour, you should probably use
nsBaseHashtable::Iterator::UserData() rather than nsBaseHashtable::Iterator::Data(). (The latter should be used when replacing nsBaseHashtable::Enumerate()).
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8688252 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd)
| Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → n.nethercote
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
| Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8688253 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8688252 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8688253 [details] [diff] [review]
(part 2) - Replace nsBaseHashtable::EnumerateRead() calls in chrome/ with iterators
Review of attachment 8688253 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I wonder how much better things would be if we did:
OverrideMapping* om = $.AppendElement();
SerializeURI(..., om->originalURI);
SerializeURI(..., om->overrideURI);
Not asking you to do this, just wondering about the micro-optimization.
Alternatively, for micro-optimizations, you could:
OverrideMapping* omptr = $.AppendElements(mOverrideTable.Count());
for (...) {
SerializeURI(..., omptr->...);
omptr++;
}
Maybe all these micro-optimizations should be a separate bug. :)
Attachment #8688253 -
Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
> Maybe all these micro-optimizations should be a separate bug. :)
Feel free to file one :) Measurements showing this code is hot would be a useful accompaniment; I suspect it's not but I've been wrong before...
| Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/401949c4008ed49464a7fd13781bee79b432a0b4
Bug 1186787 (part 1) - Replace nsBaseHashtable::EnumerateRead() calls in chrome/ with iterators. r=froydnj.
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/4e0a66f7b693d055ef52c5b17d55cb117d6296b0
Bug 1186787 (part 2) - Replace nsBaseHashtable::EnumerateRead() calls in chrome/ with iterators. r=froydnj.
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/401949c4008e
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/4e0a66f7b693
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox45:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla45
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•