Closed Bug 1196187 Opened 4 years ago Closed 4 years ago

[QA][TV 2.5] Homescreen test plan and test case

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::TV, defect, P1)

ARM
Gonk (Firefox OS)
defect

Tracking

(feature-b2g:2.5+)

RESOLVED FIXED
FxOS-S6 (04Sep)
feature-b2g 2.5+

People

(Reporter: jocheng, Assigned: cynthiatang)

References

Details

(Whiteboard: [ft:conndevices])

Attachments

(2 files)

This is QA bug for Homescreen.
Hi Cynthia,
Please help to provide Test plan and test case for developer and UX review.
Thanks!
Assignee: nobody → ctang
feature-b2g: --- → 2.5+
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Target Milestone: --- → FxOS-S6 (04Sep)
Attached file Test Plan
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Attached file Test Cases
Hi Josh,
Some functions are not ready or not implemented. Could you please review the test plan and test cases first? Thanks!
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(jocheng)
Hi Cynthia,
Can you please ask review/feedback from UX and Developer? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Attachment #8652160 - Flags: feedback?(tchen)
Attachment #8652160 - Flags: feedback?(rexboy)
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(tchen)
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(rexboy)
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(jocheng)
I'm really not sure if this is something that need to be reviewed by developer.
Also I haven't reviewed similar QA documents before.
Do other teams also started to do this? 

Anyway here's some comments I found after viewing it,

Add a new folder that contains a card. < What does it mean? I suppose we can only add empty folders and put cuts into it.
Use same names will generate error < Not sure if we allow this. I guess they don’t popup errors.
Create same name of deleted folder is not a problem. < I don’t understand this.
Currently notification comes from apps, background apps. Presentation API and Cloud Service are not implemented
Attachment #8652160 - Flags: feedback?(rexboy) → feedback+
Josh, what do you expect me to review on the test cases?
Should I take a whole detailed look row-by-row?
Flags: needinfo?(jocheng)
Hi Rex,
Thank for your help. You don't need to take a whole detailed look row-by-row. UX will host another meeting for Home. Thank you again!
Flags: needinfo?(jocheng)
(In reply to KM Lee [:rexboy] from comment #6)
> Josh, what do you expect me to review on the test cases?
> Should I take a whole detailed look row-by-row?

Hi Rex, Hi Cynthia,
Review Test plan will be sufficient and you do not need to review TC row by row.
The purpose of Test plan reviewing is to make sure QA does not miss any area need to test.
It could be some place which refactor more and you like QA to enhance test in order to avoid regression.
Thanks.
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment on attachment 8652166 [details]
Test Cases

ok, thank you!

I'll clear the request then.
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(rexboy)
Attachment #8652166 - Flags: feedback?(tchen)
Attachment #8652160 - Flags: feedback?(tchen)
Thanks for your review and feedback! :)
UX has updated the spec based on previous questions from QA.
Please visit this link for more info, thanks.
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5RN80W56Ga9VlFsNG9IS194Nms
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
It looks good to me. Thank you!:)
Flags: needinfo?(ctang)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Resolution: WORKSFORME → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.