Closed Bug 1197145 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Add easy zero/bool checks to TimeDuration and TimeStamp

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla43
Tracking Status
firefox43 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: mozbugz, Assigned: mozbugz)

Details

Attachments

(1 file, 1 obsolete file)

I've found myself wanting a quick check for unit-less 0-values on [Base]TimeDuration objects, as currently this can only be done quite verbosely, e.g. |if (duration == TimeDuration(0)|. By extension, the same could be useful for TimeStamp. There is already a TimeStamp::IsNull(). Proposed additions: 1. |bool BaseTimeDuration::IsZero() const|, for consistency with TimeStamp::IsNull(). 2. |explicit BaseTimeDuration::operator bool() const|, for easy |if (duration)| tests. 3. |explicit TimeStamp::operator bool() const|, for easy |if (timestamp)| tests.
Implementation of BaseTimeDuration::IsZero(), BaseTimeDuration::operator bool(), TimeStamp::operator bool(). Happy to discuss whether we actually need&want any/all of these. Also I could split them in separate patches if preferred.
Assignee: nobody → gsquelart
Attachment #8650971 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
(Sorry for the new rev, fixed a compilation error on Windows.) Implementation of BaseTimeDuration::IsZero(), BaseTimeDuration::operator bool(), TimeStamp::operator bool(). Happy to discuss whether we actually need&want any/all of these. Also I could split them in separate patches if preferred.
Attachment #8650971 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8650971 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Attachment #8650998 - Flags: review?(nfroyd)
Attachment #8650998 - Flags: review?(nfroyd) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla43
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: