Closed
Bug 1204247
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 5 years ago
Remove code supporting metro under testing/
Categories
(Testing :: General, defect)
Testing
General
Tracking
(firefox66 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla66
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox66 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: chmanchester, Assigned: spiro, Mentored)
References
Details
(Keywords: good-first-bug, Whiteboard: [good first bug][lang=python])
Attachments
(3 files)
169.72 KB,
patch
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review | |
169.31 KB,
patch
|
jmaher
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
47 bytes,
text/x-phabricator-request
|
Details | Review |
Bug 1039866 got most of it out of m-c, there's further to go in mochitest (and a bit in mozbase and mozharness). https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=path%3Atesting+metro for a start, and anything mentioning immersiveMode.
Updated•6 years ago
|
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Sure, here are the documentations: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Introduction https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/How_to_Submit_a_Patch
Flags: needinfo?(sledru)
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
:sylvestre What to do exactly in this? Need to remove all these lines? https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=path%3Atesting+metro
Flags: needinfo?(sledru)
If no one is assigned on this work. I would like to work on this issue.
Comment 6•6 years ago
|
||
Sure, I will assign it to the first person who reported a good first patch!
Hi, I have never contributed to an Open Source before, but willing to be a part of it. Can anyone please help me, where do I work, and how do I start ? I did read a few documentations but still haven't been able to figure things out. Also, I don't seem to find any bugs to work on. I am trying to do something in python but looks like all bugs are assigned. What do I do ? Thank you,
Comment 9•6 years ago
|
||
Try IRC, #Introduction channel. also look for 'Good-First-Bug' (In reply to JJ from comment #8) > Hi, > I have never contributed to an Open Source before, but willing to be a part > of it. Can anyone please help me, where do I work, and how do I start ? I > did read a few documentations but still haven't been able to figure things > out. > Also, I don't seem to find any bugs to work on. I am trying to do something > in python but looks like all bugs are assigned. What do I do ? > Thank you,
Comment 10•6 years ago
|
||
im new to here. how do i get started to fix bug? i have checked doc and i still have no clue.
Comment 11•6 years ago
|
||
See comment #2
Comment 12•6 years ago
|
||
Hi I would like to work on this bug! Could you please point me in the right direction of how to start.
Comment 13•6 years ago
|
||
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Introduction and https://whatcanidoformozilla.org/#!/progornoprog/proglang/py will help. do you know metro? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metro_(design_language) https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?q=path%3Atesting+metro if the code there looks like handling metro-specific thing, it needs to be removed. Also for the quick guidance ask your queries in IRC #Introduction (In reply to Devika Sugathan from comment #12) > Hi > I would like to work on this bug! Could you please point me in the right > direction of how to start.
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
Attachment #9006882 -
Flags: review?(sledru)
Comment 16•6 years ago
|
||
Could you please use phabricator? By the way, you don't want to do this change: suggested_reviewers: - - metromoxie This isn't about Windows Metro
Comment 17•6 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I had faced an error while using phabricator. Can I submit the patch here?
Attachment #9007132 -
Flags: review?(dminor)
Comment 18•6 years ago
|
||
What was the error you had with phabricator?
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #9006882 -
Flags: review?(sledru)
Comment 19•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9007132 [details] [diff] [review] Updated.patch Review of attachment 9007132 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- This seems reasonable to me, but it's been a while since I've really looked at the testing code. Redirecting to :jmaher :)
Attachment #9007132 -
Flags: review?(dminor) → review?(jmaher)
Comment 20•6 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 9007132 [details] [diff] [review] Updated.patch Review of attachment 9007132 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I am fine using splinter, but please make sure you test your changes- I do not see how |./mach mochitest| will run, let alone the sunspider test in talos now. I look forward to a cleaned up patch! ::: testing/mochitest/mochitest_options.py @@ +791,4 @@ > if options.immersiveMode: > if not mozinfo.isWin: > parser.error("immersive is only supported on Windows 8 and up.") > + nit: you have a blank line with whitespace here, please remove the whitespace ::: testing/mochitest/runtests.py @@ +894,1 @@ > self.browserProcessId = None we removed the comment, do we need browserProcessId? I would recommend searching for uses of this and looking at the history in case other scenarios use it. @@ +1077,3 @@ > self.testRoot = options.flavor > > if options.flavor == 'browser' and options.immersiveMode: please remove the if statement, this is invalid syntax. @@ +2935,4 @@ > self.lsanLeaks = lsanLeaks > self.bisectChunk = bisectChunk > > + nit: another line with just whitespace. @@ +2939,1 @@ > # output which we need to pick up on and parse out. This variable tracks the real removing 2 lines doesn't necessarily work here- the comment is not useful. In fact, this leads up to the question do we need browserProcessId? ::: testing/talos/talos/tests/dromaeo/tests/sunspider-string-tagcloud.html @@ +24,4 @@ > * PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY > * OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT > * (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE > + * OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. please do not change anything in this file- there is reference to the 5 characters 'metro' in here, but it is part of a larger word and this is a specific benchmark.
Attachment #9007132 -
Flags: review?(jmaher) → review-
Comment 21•5 years ago
|
||
Hi, Is there still more work to be done on this? I'd be happy to take a look at finishing it up if so. Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 22•5 years ago
|
||
Bug 1204247: Remove code supporting metro under testing/
Comment 23•5 years ago
|
||
Pushed by sledru@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/c06f16a4668c Remove code supporting metro under testing/ r=jmaher
Comment 25•5 years ago
|
||
this has been landed- we are waiting for it the merge to mainline mozilla-central branch which usually happens twice/day, I think in the next 3-4 hours.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Comment 26•5 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c06f16a4668c
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 5 years ago
status-firefox66:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla66
Updated•5 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → sharma.divyansh.501
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•