[HELPWANTED] clean up vocabulary usage

NEW
Unassigned

Status

()

Core
RDF
P3
normal
18 years ago
4 years ago

People

(Reporter: Chris Waterson, Unassigned)

Tracking

(Depends on: 1 bug, {helpwanted})

Trunk
Future
helpwanted
Points:
---

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Reporter)

Description

18 years ago
Currently, our "NC" vocabulary is a pile of ad-hoc hacks that have evolved over
time. We need to go on a crusade to formalize this and publish it. I volunteer
to start.
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Target Milestone: M11
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Target Milestone: M11 → M15
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Summary: clean up vocabulary usage → [HELPWANTED] clean up vocabulary usage
(Reporter)

Comment 1

18 years ago
sigh. this'll have to wait.

Updated

18 years ago
QA Contact: phillip

Comment 2

18 years ago
no qa contact needed

Updated

18 years ago
Keywords: helpwanted
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Target Milestone: M15 → M20
(Reporter)

Updated

17 years ago
Target Milestone: M20 → Future

Comment 3

17 years ago
Is there anything in particular you need cleaned up, or is this just a generic 
request?  I can certainly help with verifying consistency and syntax...
(Reporter)

Comment 4

17 years ago
what we need is for somebody to

1. poke through the code base to catalogue the use of the 
http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf# namespace. Here's a starter list:

http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/search?string=home.netscape.com%2FNC-rdf%23

2. Optionally write an RDF/XML schema for that catalogue.

3. identify places where use of a well-known vocabulary (e.g., Dublin Core) 
would be more appropriate

4. file bugs on components to fix specific problems identified in (3)

Comment 5

17 years ago
I have *no* idea, what you mean with tasks 1-3.

Comment 6

16 years ago
I did some poking around to generate a preliminary list of resources in the
NC-rdf# namespace, and the list is somewhat daunting -- it's close to 300 items
long (and I can't guarantee I didn't miss any, in fact it's likely).

There are a few issues with capitalization, producing redundant elements ("Name"
versus "name", "MIME-Type" v. "MIME-Types" v. "MIME-types").  Close to a third
of the elements appear to be supported by custom datasource code but are never
actually used.

A number of chunks of this list could probably be split off into self-contained
schemas used by a single component.  That might help impose some order on
things, but this is still a pretty enormous task.

Updated

14 years ago
Depends on: 182694

Updated

14 years ago
Depends on: 17620

Comment 7

13 years ago
waterson left the building
Assignee: waterson → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
QA Contact: core.rdf

Updated

12 years ago
No longer depends on: 17620

Comment 8

4 years ago
This seems like the kind of anal-retentive thing I'd be good at.  What type of capitalization are we looking for?  For example:

rdf:http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#name

or

rdf:http://home.netscape.com/NC-rdf#Name
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.