Closed Bug 1217494 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

releng configs to reallocate 30 linux64 talos machines as w7 test machines

Categories

(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task)

task
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: kmoir, Assigned: aselagea)

References

Details

Attachments

(3 files, 3 obsolete files)

      No description provided.
And also let's split it like this:
* Win7 13 machines
* Win8 17 machines (a bit more backlogged atm)

That would bring us to:
* Win7 -> 202 -> 215 (1 disabled atm)
* Win8 -> 194 -> 211 (7 disabled atm)
talos-linux64-ix-70-99  have been disabled in slavealloc
Attached patch bug1217494.patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
disable and enable
QA Contact: coop → kmoir
Assignee: nobody → kmoir
vlad/alin: from bug 1217493 we are going to reimage them all as w7 machines so you can update the existing patch for the production_config.py to reflect this and create patches to add them to slavealloc and the graph server
Summary: releng configs to reallocate 30 linux64 talos machines as windows test machines → releng configs to reallocate 30 linux64 talos machines as w7 test machines
Assignee: kmoir → nobody
Assignee: nobody → alin.selagea
Attached patch bug1217494.patchSplinter Review
buildbot-configs changes
Attachment #8678982 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8679936 - Flags: review?(kmoir)
Attached file graphserver.txt (obsolete) —
mysql entries to insert the new machines to graphserver
Attachment #8679937 - Flags: review?(kmoir)
Attached file slavealloc.csv (obsolete) —
csv file to add the new slaves to slavealloc
Attachment #8679939 - Flags: review?(kmoir)
Attachment #8679936 - Flags: review?(kmoir) → review+
Attachment #8679937 - Flags: review?(kmoir) → review+
Comment on attachment 8679939 [details]
slavealloc.csv

pool is tests-inhouse-win7dows should be tests-inhouse-windows
Attachment #8679939 - Flags: review?(kmoir) → review-
Attached file slavealloc.csv
Missed that, sorry. Added the correct version.
Attachment #8679939 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8680011 - Flags: review?(kmoir)
While creating the patch to add the machines to graph server, I checked several talos-linux64-ix and noticed that the CPU used is "Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X3450 @ 2.67GHz 2.67GHz"

Did the same thing for several existing t-w732-ix machines and all of them were using the same CPU.

Going further, I looked on graph db and it follows that the e10s values for t-w732-ix machines all have the cpu_speed parameter set to 3.14. On the patch submitted above I also set the same values for e10s. 

My question would be: does this impact the way the results are interpreted on those machines? 

Thanks.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
no, the cpu speed is not needed.
Flags: needinfo?(jmaher)
Attached file graphserver.txt
Attachment #8679937 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8680039 - Flags: review?(kmoir)
Attachment #8680011 - Flags: review?(kmoir) → review+
Attachment #8680039 - Flags: review?(kmoir) → review+
Attachment #8679936 - Flags: checked-in+
Comment on attachment 8680011 [details]
slavealloc.csv

imported into slavealloc
Attachment #8680011 - Flags: checked-in+
machines are up and slowly connecting to masters
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Component: Platform Support → Buildduty
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: