1218051 - [2.5] adding blocking-b2g, feature-b2g, and status-b2g flags accordingly.

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(bugzilla.mozilla.org :: Administration, task)

Description

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1181472 +++

Per Bug 1203186, we will have the new branch 2.5.
Please add flags for us to manage this repo.

a. Project flags / blocking-b2g :
add 2.5r? and 2.5r+

b. Project flags / feature-b2g :
add 2.5r? and 2.5r+

c. Tracking flags 
add status-b2g-v2.5 with relevant attributes: ?, unaffected, affected, fixed, ...etc.

Comment 1

[David Lawrence [:dkl]]

(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #0)
> +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1181472 +++
> 
> Per Bug 1203186, we will have the new branch 2.5.
> Please add flags for us to manage this repo.
> 
> a. Project flags / blocking-b2g :
> add 2.5r? and 2.5r+
> 
> b. Project flags / feature-b2g :
> add 2.5r? and 2.5r+
>
> c. Tracking flags 
> add status-b2g-v2.5 with relevant attributes: ?, unaffected, affected,
> fixed, ...etc.

All added. I assume you meant status-b2g-v2.5r so I added that. Please reopen this if that was not correct.

dkl

Comment 2

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

I think I was wrong... I mixed "r" as in "2.2r" with bugzilla's "r" (review).

The branch name is "v2.5", without a trailing "r".

Can you update the flags accordingly?

Comment 3

[David Lawrence [:dkl]]

(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #2)
> I think I was wrong... I mixed "r" as in "2.2r" with bugzilla's "r" (review).
> 
> The branch name is "v2.5", without a trailing "r".
> 
> Can you update the flags accordingly?

Ok. One of the reasons I didnt think it was an error, was there are already 2.5? and 2.5+ values for the blocking-b2g and feature-b2g flags. They were added a while back. So do you want me to just remove the 2.5r? and 2.5r+ values and leave the rest as-is?

Also there is a previous flag (disabled) matching status-b2g-v2.5 so I assumed for that one you meant status-b2g-v2.5r as well. So for that one I should delete status-b2g-v2.5r and re-enable the old status-b2g-v2.5 flag?

Thanks
dkl

Comment 4

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Oh, I didn't know there was 2.5 already! I just blindly followed one of the previous bug dependencies.

Yes, let's remove 2.5r to avoid confusion.

Sorry for the churn. :(

Comment 5

[David Lawrence [:dkl]]

(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #4)
> Oh, I didn't know there was 2.5 already! I just blindly followed one of the
> previous bug dependencies.
> 
> Yes, let's remove 2.5r to avoid confusion.
> 
> Sorry for the churn. :(

Ok then we are all done once more.

dkl

Comment 6

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Thank you! \o/