Closed Bug 1222287 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Intermittent 1221902.html | load failed: timed out waiting for test to complete (waiting for onload scripts to complete)

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

Product:
Core
Component:
Layout
Version:
45 Branch
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
normal

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED
Tracking Flags:
Tracking Status
firefox45 --- affected

People

(Reporter: KWierso, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: intermittent-failure) 

https://treeherder.mozilla.org/logviewer.html#?job_id=16881389&repo=mozilla-inbound

Mats, this has happened twice in the few hours since your patch landed. Can you look into this?
Flags: needinfo?(mats)
FTR, the log says:
 16:56:06     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-START | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html
 16:56:06     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-LOAD | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html | 149 / 728 (20%)
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | load failed with unknown reason
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-UNEXPECTED-FAIL | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html | load failed: null
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST INFO | Saved log: START http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST INFO | Loading a blank page
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-PASS | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html | (LOAD ONLY)
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST INFO | Loading a blank page
 17:08:01     INFO -  REFTEST TEST-END | http://10.0.2.2:8854/tests/layout/style/crashtests/1221902.html


I don't have any suggestions on how to fix that.
Perhaps we should just backout the crashtest if it causes trouble?
I don't think it's super important.
Blocks: 1221902
Flags: needinfo?(mats)
Wes, can you backout this cset when you get a chance?
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/534bae0f55bc
Flags: needinfo?(wkocher)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
> I don't think it's super important.

Well, it's useful to keep someone from reintroducing the problem.  Can we request a longer timeout for this test or something instead?
Flags: needinfo?(wkocher)
Not sure where exactly the longer timeout request would go, but sure.
Flags: needinfo?(wkocher)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.