Closed
Bug 1222669
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Standalone audio looks broken after hiding controls
Categories
(Toolkit :: Video/Audio Controls, defect)
Toolkit
Video/Audio Controls
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
mozilla48
People
(Reporter: arni2033, Assigned: jaws)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
7.12 KB,
patch
|
jaws
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
STR
1. Open the URL (from bug 1222374) or any other local audio file
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/s/k3i4yuc7j3s93hb/bug%20audio%20box%20shadow%20-%20donut%20quest.mp3?dl=0
2. Right-click the audio, click "Hide controls" [you'll get the empty rectangle with box-shadow]
3. Right-click the empty rectangle, click "Show controls"
4. Right-click the audio, click "Hide controls"
Actual Results:
After Step 3 <video> element has height == 0px, box-shadow isn't displayed
After Step 4 it is not possible to right-click on the <video>, because it has height == 0px
so you can't bring back the video controls.
Regression window:
> https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/fx-team/pushloghtml?fromchange=c17073bda80b&tochange=f9a5108cf2b2
Regressed by:
f9a5108cf2b2 Jared Wein — Bug 704326 - Standalone audio files should have different style so they
don't look awkward. r=smaug,dolske
Flags: needinfo?(jaws)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → jaws
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(jaws)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Review commit: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/45525/diff/#index_header
See other reviews: https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/45525/
Attachment #8740058 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs)
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8740058 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1222669 - Don't show the hidecontrols contextmenu item when viewing a standalone audio file. r?gijs
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/45525/#review42067
::: browser/base/content/nsContextMenu.js:475
(Diff revision 1)
> this.showItem("context-media-pause", onMedia && !this.target.paused && !this.target.ended);
> this.showItem("context-media-mute", onMedia && !this.target.muted);
> this.showItem("context-media-unmute", onMedia && this.target.muted);
> this.showItem("context-media-playbackrate", onMedia);
> this.showItem("context-media-showcontrols", onMedia && !this.target.controls);
> - this.showItem("context-media-hidecontrols", onMedia && this.target.controls);
> + this.showItem("context-media-hidecontrols", this.target.controls && (this.onVideo || (this.onAudio && !this.inSyntheticDoc)));
Is the explicit check for onAudio useful here? I'm assuming that onAudio == !onVideo at all times. That is, couldn't this just be:
```
(this.onVideo || !this.inSyntheticDoc)
```
?
::: browser/base/content/test/general/browser_contextmenu.js:36
(Diff revision 1)
> +
> + let audioIframe = doc.querySelector("#test-audio-in-iframe");
> + // media documents always use a <video> tag.
> + let audio = audioIframe.contentDocument.querySelector("video");
> + audio.pause();
> + yield ContentTaskUtils.waitForCondition(() => audio.paused, "iframe audio should be paused");
Is there not an event you can wait for instead?
Attachment #8740058 -
Flags: review?(gijskruitbosch+bugs) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/45525/#review42067
> Is the explicit check for onAudio useful here? I'm assuming that onAudio == !onVideo at all times. That is, couldn't this just be:
>
> ```
> (this.onVideo || !this.inSyntheticDoc)
> ```
>
> ?
Well, we don't want to show the menuitem for non-media elements. `data:text/html,<p controls=controls>this is some text</p>` shouldn't show a hideControls menuitem.
So, if we qualify that with knowing that it is onMedia, then yes, they should be mutually exclusive, but that extra qualification isn't necessary if we write it this way.
> Is there not an event you can wait for instead?
Yeah, we could wait for the pause event.
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8740058 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8740087 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox48:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla48
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
Sounds to me like this could also fix the case in bug 1010976. Setting for a quick verification.
Flags: qe-verify+
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
I've reproduced the initial issue on Nightly 06-11-2016.
Verified fixed on Windows 7 64bit, Ubuntu 13.10 32bit and Mac OSX 10.11.1 using Firefox 48 Beta 2 (buildID: 20160620091522).
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•