Document contributors' suggested path

RESOLVED FIXED

Status

Firefox OS
Gaia::UI Tests
RESOLVED FIXED
2 years ago
2 years ago

People

(Reporter: jlorenzo, Assigned: jlorenzo)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

63 bytes, text/plain
Martijn Wargers (dead)
: review+
njpark
: review+
marcia
: review+
Details
(Assignee)

Description

2 years ago
Now that we have more insight on the type of tasks, their difficulties, their scheduling, time to make this information public!
(Assignee)

Comment 1

2 years ago
Created attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page

I created this first revision. A couple of example are missing. If you guys remember some of them, or if you want to change the example already there, feel free!
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(npark)
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn)
(Assignee)

Comment 2

2 years ago
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page

Asking also Marcia, just to make sure we're in line with the participation program.
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(mozillamarcia.knous)
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page

made minor edits. looks good, except the mention of using plivo, which can be removed.
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(npark) → review+
Comment on attachment 8691400 [details]
Link to Wiki page

It looks good to me too. 
But if we're switching over to MarionetteJS, how useful would it be for contributors to work on this?
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(martijn.martijn) → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 5

2 years ago
(In reply to No-Jun Park [:njpark] from comment #3)
> except the mention of using plivo, which can be removed.
Right. Done.

(In reply to Martijn Wargers [:mwargers] (QA) from comment #4)
> But if we're switching over to MarionetteJS, how useful would it be for
> contributors to work on this?
IMO, the example will be outdated, but not flow would be still valid. Do you think anything else would need update?
Adding mermi in case she wants to add any feedback.
I forgot to add in the previous comment that right now we don't have anything formalized around contribution paths with the Participation Team, so I think we can architect our own path here for now. I will take a look at this before Mozlando and weigh in with any other comments.
I made a few grammatical edits on the page.

The other comment I would have - we reference "main contributors" but how is someone supposed to know who to ask in the channel? We should probably link that back to a page that describes what everyone on the team works on.
(Assignee)

Comment 9

2 years ago
(In reply to Marcia Knous [:marcia - use ni] from comment #8)
> We should probably link that back to a page that describes what everyone on the team works on.

Good thinking, I made the change. Thanks
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review?(mozillamarcia.knous) → review-
Attachment #8691400 - Flags: review- → review+
(Assignee)

Comment 10

2 years ago
Was published at https://wiki.mozilla.org/B2G/QA/Automation/UI/How_to_contribute
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 2 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.