Closed
Bug 1233901
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Tweak earliest known good start dates for jsshell builds
Categories
(Testing :: mozregression, defect)
Testing
mozregression
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: parkouss)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug)
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 1 obsolete file)
The following are the earliest known good start dates for jsshell builds that I've found on FTP:
2012-04-18 - Linux x86/x86-64, mac, win32
2013-09-01 - linux x64-asan
2014-05-27 - win64
Attachment #8700250 -
Flags: review?(wlachance)
Attachment #8700250 -
Flags: feedback?(j.parkouss)
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8700250 -
Attachment is patch: true
Reporter | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → gary
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8700250 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v1
This needs more thinking:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2012/04/2012-04-17-03-06-41-mozilla-central/
has opt builds, but:
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2012/04/2012-04-18-mozilla-central-debug/
is definitely the first set of debug builds for some platforms.
I think I need to go back further for opt builds.
Attachment #8700250 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8700250 -
Flags: review?(wlachance)
Attachment #8700250 -
Flags: feedback?(j.parkouss)
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Note to self:
https://archive.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/2012/04/2012-04-18-mozilla-central-debug/
archive.mozilla.org should probably be used instead of ftp.mozilla.org.
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Not working on this for the moment.
Julien, do you have any idea on how best to move this forward?
Assignee: gary → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
Flags: needinfo?(j.parkouss)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
If there is one day between opt/debugs (comment 1) we can just use the earliest. Mozregression will emit a warning when it won't find a build, but it will take the next one and since it exists it should be fast enough.
So I think we can just implement what is described in comment 0.
Assignee: nobody → j.parkouss
Flags: needinfo?(j.parkouss)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8724375 -
Flags: review?(wlachance)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8724375 -
Flags: review?(wlachance) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
All looks good, landed in https://github.com/mozilla/mozregression/commit/2928195c504e55423506b1f46f88818d2b95f5f2.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•