Closed
Bug 1235663
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Example uses incorrect function name
Categories
(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: JavaScript, defect, P5)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: m.sakrejda, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
:: Developer Documentation Request Request Type: Correction Gecko Version: unspecified Technical Contact: :: Details The documentation for the `default` option of `export` uses an internally inconsistent example: the setup of the export is ``` // module "my-module.js" let cube = function cube(x) { return x * x * x; } export default cube; ``` but the import is ``` // module "my-module.js" import myFunction from 'my-module'; console.log(myFunction(3)); // 27 ``` which doesn't use the `cube` function at all. Shouldn't this second one be using `cube` instead of `myFunction`?
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
This is to illustrate the default export behavior and therefore it can be "myFunction", but I adjusted the example a bit to be less confusing.
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•