Closed Bug 1238170 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Improve dev server room routing code clarity

Categories

(Hello (Loop) :: Client, defect, P3)

defect

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: dmosedale, Assigned: dmosedale)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files, 1 obsolete file)

No description provided.
https://github.com/mozilla/loop/commit/4c69c769e3b007b7e5aa9960ca2342c4f3ea0aac#diff-8d44631bfd02d64ee75348ab92f466c0L106 regressed the ability to run a local loop-server pointing to a local dev server, which makes debugging some key standalone changes (eg CSP changes) impossible.
Assignee: nobody → dmose
Blocks: 1212428
Rank: 20
Priority: -- → P2
Attachment #8705869 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(standard8)
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(edilee)
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(dcritchley)
Comment on attachment 8705875 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla/loop/pull/62 If I understand this right, then I don't want to do this. What I think the PR is allowing for is /content/<token> as well as /<token>. When we set up the new standalone server I purposely decided to drop the /content part of the url. This was to make us closer to the real production system, and avoid a lot of the complicated hacks that we had in place. Unfortunately I didn't do a very good job of remembering to communicate that. Hence, I really don't think we should allow /content, and rather update the loop-server default configs and our example dev config to drop the /content from the urls (and inform all devs, which I'll send out on Monday).
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(standard8)
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(edilee)
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(dcritchley)
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review-
Comment on attachment 8705875 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla/loop/pull/62 Updated to not add extra routing, but keep clarity.
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review- → review?(standard8)
Summary: Fix dev server regression to handle local server calls → Improve dev server room routing code clarity
Rank: 20 → 35
Priority: P2 → P3
Comment on attachment 8705875 [details] [review] Link to Github pull-request: https://github.com/mozilla/loop/pull/62 Looks good.
Attachment #8705875 - Flags: review?(standard8) → review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: