Closed
Bug 1242717
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
Add BHR coverage for all CPOW functions
Categories
(Toolkit :: Telemetry, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 1224374
People
(Reporter: vladan, Assigned: Yoric)
References
Details
Our CPOW histograms are Nightly-only, but we want to get extension performance information from the Beta 45 experiment. I propose we add BHR pseudostack annotations to all CPOW functions so we can track extension CPOW usage via BHR. This is similar to bug 1224374 and will need uplifting to beta2 of Beta 45.
Flags: needinfo?(dteller)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
I'm pretty sure I did this already in bug 1224374.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(dteller)
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
As discussed with Vladan, I'm not 100% sure that I cover everything. I have instrumented all the methods of the CPOWWrapper. Can someone thing of something that this may be missing, for instance on the content-side?
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Flags: needinfo?(wmccloskey)
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
Flags: needinfo?(jmathies)
Resolution: DUPLICATE → ---
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
I meant CPOWProxyHandler.
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Deferring to billm, who definitely knows more about the underlying CPOW infrastructure. If he's unavailable, I'd ask mrbkap next.
Flags: needinfo?(mconley)
This is the only place you should need to instrument: https://dxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/source/js/ipc/WrapperOwner.cpp#158 It will cover CPOWs in both directions.
Flags: needinfo?(wmccloskey)
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•8 years ago
|
||
Ok, so since I did that already in bug 1224374, we're done. Thanks.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago → 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•