Closed Bug 1244727 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

Remove expired histogram probes

Categories

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(firefox47 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
Firefox 47
Tracking Status
firefox47 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: Margaret, Assigned: Margaret)

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

No description provided.
Comment on attachment 8714317 [details] MozReview Request: Bug 1244727 - Remove expired histogram probes. r=mfinkle https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/33013/#review29933 ::: mobile/android/base/java/org/mozilla/gecko/db/LocalURLMetadata.java (Diff revision 1) > - Telemetry.addToHistogram("FENNEC_TILES_CACHE_HIT", data.size()); ahunt has been in this code recently. I wonder if he has any reason to look at the existing data?
Attachment #8714317 - Flags: review?(mark.finkle) → review+
(In reply to Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 8714317 [details] > MozReview Request: Bug 1244727 - Remove expired histogram probes. r=mfinkle > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/33013/#review29933 > > ::: mobile/android/base/java/org/mozilla/gecko/db/LocalURLMetadata.java > (Diff revision 1) > > - Telemetry.addToHistogram("FENNEC_TILES_CACHE_HIT", data.size()); > > ahunt has been in this code recently. I wonder if he has any reason to look > at the existing data? This expired in version 40, so there won't be any recent data. We could recreate these probes if we think the data would be valuable.
Flags: needinfo?(ahunt)
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 47
(In reply to Mark Finkle (:mfinkle) from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 8714317 [details] > MozReview Request: Bug 1244727 - Remove expired histogram probes. r=mfinkle > > https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/33013/#review29933 > > ::: mobile/android/base/java/org/mozilla/gecko/db/LocalURLMetadata.java > (Diff revision 1) > > - Telemetry.addToHistogram("FENNEC_TILES_CACHE_HIT", data.size()); > > ahunt has been in this code recently. I wonder if he has any reason to look > at the existing data? My changes were just adding an extra field to the data in the cache, but caching behaviour (and the resulting data.size() ) shouldn't be affected, so I don't think there's much value for me in keeping this around.
Flags: needinfo?(ahunt)
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox for Android Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: