Closed
Bug 1244728
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Problems updating Jenkins on webqa-ci1.qa.scl3.mozilla.com
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations :: Infrastructure: Puppet, task)
Infrastructure & Operations
Infrastructure: Puppet
Tracking
(Not tracked)
VERIFIED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: davehunt, Unassigned)
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
2.19 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
The last few Jenkins updates for webqa-ci1.qa.scl3.mozilla.com haven't worked as expected. The update command appears to hang, and after interrupting it and trying again, the update is reported to have been installed. Starting Jenkins again does confirm that the update was installed.
Here's the initial update attempt, including the interrupt:
> [dhunt@webqa-ci1.qa.scl3 ~]$ sudo yum-wrapper update jenkins
> Pinned packages detected, excluding the following from yum update jenkins:
>
> bacula-enterprise-client 8.2.8-1.el6
> facter 2.0.2-1.el6
> puppet 3.6.2-1.el6
>
> Command string: yum -x bacula-enterprise-client -x facter -x puppet update jenkins
> Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
> This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or RHN Satellite.
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.1-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.2-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.3-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.642.1-1.1 will be an update
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
> =========================================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> =========================================================================================
> Updating:
> jenkins noarch 1.642.1-1.1 jenkins 61 M
>
> Transaction Summary
> =========================================================================================
> Upgrade 1 Package(s)
>
> Total download size: 61 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch.rpm | 61 MB 00:03
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
> Transaction Test Succeeded
> Running Transaction
> Updating : jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch 1/4
> ^CError in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch
> error: %post(jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch) scriptlet failed, signal 2
Here's the second update attempt:
> [dhunt@webqa-ci1.qa.scl3 ~]$ sudo yum-wrapper update jenkins
> Pinned packages detected, excluding the following from yum update jenkins:
>
> bacula-enterprise-client 8.2.8-1.el6
> facter 2.0.2-1.el6
> puppet 3.6.2-1.el6
>
> Command string: yum -x bacula-enterprise-client -x facter -x puppet update jenkins
> Loaded plugins: rhnplugin, security
> This system is receiving updates from RHN Classic or RHN Satellite.
> Setting up Update Process
> Resolving Dependencies
> --> Running transaction check
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.1-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.2-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.625.3-1.1 will be updated
> ---> Package jenkins.noarch 0:1.642.1-1.1 will be an update
> --> Finished Dependency Resolution
>
> Dependencies Resolved
>
> =========================================================================================
> Package Arch Version Repository Size
> =========================================================================================
> Updating:
> jenkins noarch 1.642.1-1.1 jenkins 61 M
>
> Transaction Summary
> =========================================================================================
> Upgrade 1 Package(s)
>
> Total download size: 61 M
> Is this ok [y/N]: y
> Downloading Packages:
> jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch.rpm | 61 MB 00:17
> Running rpm_check_debug
> Running Transaction Test
>
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> package jenkins-1.642.1-1.1.noarch is already installed
>
> Error Summary
> -------------
The same command on webqa-staging-ci1 does not show the same behaviour.
As a note, we didn't see this last night when I updated successfully 1.651.1 (attached logfile).
Dave, should we close this out for now? I'd be fine with that.
Flags: needinfo?(dave.hunt)
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Yes, let's close it and reopen if needed in the future.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(dave.hunt)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
(In reply to Dave Hunt (:davehunt) from comment #4)
> Yes, let's close it and reopen if needed in the future.
Thanks, Dave. Verified.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•